Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

debian логотип

CVE-2026-27017

Опубликовано: 20 фев. 2026
Источник: debian
EPSS Низкий

Описание

uTLS is a fork of crypto/tls, created to customize ClientHello for fingerprinting resistance while still using it for the handshake. Versions 1.6.0 through 1.8.0 contain a fingerprint mismatch with Chrome when using GREASE ECH, related to cipher suite selection. When Chrome selects the preferred cipher suite in the outer ClientHello and for ECH, it does so consistently based on hardware support—for example, if it prefers AES for the outer cipher suite, it also uses AES for ECH. However, the Chrome parrot in uTLS hardcodes AES preference for outer cipher suites but selects the ECH cipher suite randomly between AES and ChaCha20. This creates a 50% chance of selecting ChaCha20 for ECH while using AES for the outer cipher suite, a combination impossible in Chrome. This issue only affects GREASE ECH; in real ECH, Chrome selects the first valid cipher suite when AES is preferred, which uTLS handles correctly. This issue has been fixed in version 1.8.1.

Пакеты

ПакетСтатусВерсия исправленияРелизТип
golang-refraction-networking-utlsnot-affectedpackage

Примечания

  • https://github.com/refraction-networking/utls/security/advisories/GHSA-7m29-f4hw-g2vx

  • Introduced after: https://github.com/refraction-networking/utls/commit/b4de442d0250c0f55d8873d95e589ff9206a3ae7 (v1.6.0)

  • Fixed by: https://github.com/refraction-networking/utls/commit/24bd1e05a788c1add7f3037f4532ea552b2cee07 (v1.8.1)

EPSS

Процентиль: 1%
0.00009
Низкий

Связанные уязвимости

CVSS3: 5.3
ubuntu
около 1 месяца назад

uTLS is a fork of crypto/tls, created to customize ClientHello for fingerprinting resistance while still using it for the handshake. Versions 1.6.0 through 1.8.0 contain a fingerprint mismatch with Chrome when using GREASE ECH, related to cipher suite selection. When Chrome selects the preferred cipher suite in the outer ClientHello and for ECH, it does so consistently based on hardware support—for example, if it prefers AES for the outer cipher suite, it also uses AES for ECH. However, the Chrome parrot in uTLS hardcodes AES preference for outer cipher suites but selects the ECH cipher suite randomly between AES and ChaCha20. This creates a 50% chance of selecting ChaCha20 for ECH while using AES for the outer cipher suite, a combination impossible in Chrome. This issue only affects GREASE ECH; in real ECH, Chrome selects the first valid cipher suite when AES is preferred, which uTLS handles correctly. This issue has been fixed in version 1.8.1.

CVSS3: 5.3
nvd
около 1 месяца назад

uTLS is a fork of crypto/tls, created to customize ClientHello for fingerprinting resistance while still using it for the handshake. Versions 1.6.0 through 1.8.0 contain a fingerprint mismatch with Chrome when using GREASE ECH, related to cipher suite selection. When Chrome selects the preferred cipher suite in the outer ClientHello and for ECH, it does so consistently based on hardware support—for example, if it prefers AES for the outer cipher suite, it also uses AES for ECH. However, the Chrome parrot in uTLS hardcodes AES preference for outer cipher suites but selects the ECH cipher suite randomly between AES and ChaCha20. This creates a 50% chance of selecting ChaCha20 for ECH while using AES for the outer cipher suite, a combination impossible in Chrome. This issue only affects GREASE ECH; in real ECH, Chrome selects the first valid cipher suite when AES is preferred, which uTLS handles correctly. This issue has been fixed in version 1.8.1.

github
около 1 месяца назад

uTLS has a fingerprint vulnerability from GREASE ECH mismatch for Chrome parrots

EPSS

Процентиль: 1%
0.00009
Низкий