Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

debian логотип

CVE-2026-6330

Опубликовано: 25 июн. 2026
Источник: debian
EPSS Низкий

Описание

The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform's implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard's required implicit rejection.

Пакеты

ПакетСтатусВерсия исправленияРелизТип
wolfsslfixed5.9.2-1package
wolfsslno-dsatrixiepackage
wolfsslend-of-lifebookwormpackage
wolfsslpostponedbullseyepackage

Примечания

  • https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/10192 (v5.9.2-stable)

EPSS

Процентиль: 3%
0.00135
Низкий

Связанные уязвимости

CVSS3: 6.5
ubuntu
около 1 месяца назад

The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform's implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard's required implicit rejection.

CVSS3: 6.5
nvd
около 1 месяца назад

The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform's implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard's required implicit rejection.

msrc
около 1 месяца назад

ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input

CVSS3: 6.5
github
около 1 месяца назад

The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform's implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard's required implicit rejection.

EPSS

Процентиль: 3%
0.00135
Низкий