Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

fstec логотип

BDU:2025-07835

Опубликовано: 07 янв. 2025
Источник: fstec
CVSS3: 5.5
CVSS2: 4.6
EPSS Низкий

Описание

Уязвимость компонента arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c ядра операционной системы Linux связана с ошибками преобразования типов данных. Эксплуатация уязвимости может позволить нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

Вендор

Сообщество свободного программного обеспечения
ООО «РусБИТех-Астра»

Наименование ПО

Debian GNU/Linux
Astra Linux Special Edition
Linux

Версия ПО

11 (Debian GNU/Linux)
12 (Debian GNU/Linux)
1.8 (Astra Linux Special Edition)
от 6.6 до 6.6.72 (Linux)
от 6.7 до 6.12.до 6.13-rc7 (Linux)

Тип ПО

Операционная система

Операционные системы и аппаратные платформы

Сообщество свободного программного обеспечения Debian GNU/Linux 11
Сообщество свободного программного обеспечения Debian GNU/Linux 12
ООО «РусБИТех-Астра» Astra Linux Special Edition 1.8
Сообщество свободного программного обеспечения Linux от 6.6 до 6.6.72
Сообщество свободного программного обеспечения Linux от 6.7 до 6.12.до 6.13-rc7

Уровень опасности уязвимости

Средний уровень опасности (базовая оценка CVSS 2.0 составляет 4,6)
Средний уровень опасности (базовая оценка CVSS 3.1 составляет 5,5)

Возможные меры по устранению уязвимости

В условиях отсутствия обновлений безопасности от производителя рекомендуется придерживаться "Рекомендаций по безопасной настройке операционных систем LINUX", изложенных в методическом документе ФСТЭК России, утверждённом 25 декабря 2022 года.
Использование рекомендаций:
Для Linux:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2025011942-CVE-2025-21632-9fde@gregkh/
Для Debian GNU/Linux:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-21632
Для ОС Astra Linux:
- обновить пакет linux-6.6 до 6.12.11-1.astra1+ci18 или более высокой версии, используя рекомендации производителя: https://wiki.astralinux.ru/astra-linux-se18-bulletin-2025-0411SE18

Статус уязвимости

Подтверждена производителем

Наличие эксплойта

Данные уточняются

Информация об устранении

Уязвимость устранена

Идентификаторы других систем описаний уязвимостей

EPSS

Процентиль: 11%
0.0004
Низкий

5.5 Medium

CVSS3

4.6 Medium

CVSS2

Связанные уязвимости

ubuntu
6 месяцев назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/fpu: Ensure shadow stack is active before "getting" registers The x86 shadow stack support has its own set of registers. Those registers are XSAVE-managed, but they are "supervisor state components" which means that userspace can not touch them with XSAVE/XRSTOR. It also means that they are not accessible from the existing ptrace ABI for XSAVE state. Thus, there is a new ptrace get/set interface for it. The regset code that ptrace uses provides an ->active() handler in addition to the get/set ones. For shadow stack this ->active() handler verifies that shadow stack is enabled via the ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK bit in the thread struct. The ->active() handler is checked from some call sites of the regset get/set handlers, but not the ptrace ones. This was not understood when shadow stack support was put in place. As a result, both the set/get handlers can be called with XFEATURE_CET_USER in its init state, which would...

CVSS3: 4.4
redhat
6 месяцев назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/fpu: Ensure shadow stack is active before "getting" registers The x86 shadow stack support has its own set of registers. Those registers are XSAVE-managed, but they are "supervisor state components" which means that userspace can not touch them with XSAVE/XRSTOR. It also means that they are not accessible from the existing ptrace ABI for XSAVE state. Thus, there is a new ptrace get/set interface for it. The regset code that ptrace uses provides an ->active() handler in addition to the get/set ones. For shadow stack this ->active() handler verifies that shadow stack is enabled via the ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK bit in the thread struct. The ->active() handler is checked from some call sites of the regset get/set handlers, but not the ptrace ones. This was not understood when shadow stack support was put in place. As a result, both the set/get handlers can be called with XFEATURE_CET_USER in its init state, which would cau...

nvd
6 месяцев назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/fpu: Ensure shadow stack is active before "getting" registers The x86 shadow stack support has its own set of registers. Those registers are XSAVE-managed, but they are "supervisor state components" which means that userspace can not touch them with XSAVE/XRSTOR. It also means that they are not accessible from the existing ptrace ABI for XSAVE state. Thus, there is a new ptrace get/set interface for it. The regset code that ptrace uses provides an ->active() handler in addition to the get/set ones. For shadow stack this ->active() handler verifies that shadow stack is enabled via the ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK bit in the thread struct. The ->active() handler is checked from some call sites of the regset get/set handlers, but not the ptrace ones. This was not understood when shadow stack support was put in place. As a result, both the set/get handlers can be called with XFEATURE_CET_USER in its init state, which would ca

debian
6 месяцев назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x ...

github
6 месяцев назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/fpu: Ensure shadow stack is active before "getting" registers The x86 shadow stack support has its own set of registers. Those registers are XSAVE-managed, but they are "supervisor state components" which means that userspace can not touch them with XSAVE/XRSTOR. It also means that they are not accessible from the existing ptrace ABI for XSAVE state. Thus, there is a new ptrace get/set interface for it. The regset code that ptrace uses provides an ->active() handler in addition to the get/set ones. For shadow stack this ->active() handler verifies that shadow stack is enabled via the ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK bit in the thread struct. The ->active() handler is checked from some call sites of the regset get/set handlers, but not the ptrace ones. This was not understood when shadow stack support was put in place. As a result, both the set/get handlers can be called with XFEATURE_CET_USER in its init state, which would...

EPSS

Процентиль: 11%
0.0004
Низкий

5.5 Medium

CVSS3

4.6 Medium

CVSS2