Описание
Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE.
Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE.
Ссылки
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-2656
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/289-1
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2006-May/msg00127.html
- http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-security-announce/2006-Jun/0008.html
- http://marc.info/?l=vuln-dev&m=114857412916909&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20501
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20520
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20766
- http://secunia.com/advisories/21002
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200607-03.xml
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1091
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:095
Связанные уязвимости
Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE.
Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE.
Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE.
Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 ...
Уязвимости операционной системы Gentoo Linux, позволяющие удаленному злоумышленнику нарушить конфиденциальность, целостность и доступность защищаемой информации