Описание
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
Ссылки
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-9515
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/392108390cef48af647a2e47b7fd5380e050e35ae8d1aa2030254c04@%3Cusers.trafficserver.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ad3d01e767199c1aed8033bb6b3f5bf98c011c7c536f07a5d34b3c19%40%3Cannounce.trafficserver.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ad3d01e767199c1aed8033bb6b3f5bf98c011c7c536f07a5d34b3c19@%3Cannounce.trafficserver.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bde52309316ae798186d783a5e29f4ad1527f61c9219a289d0eee0a7%40%3Cdev.trafficserver.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bde52309316ae798186d783a5e29f4ad1527f61c9219a289d0eee0a7@%3Cdev.trafficserver.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4ZQGHE3WTYLYAYJEIDJVF2FIGQTAYPMC
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CMNFX5MNYRWWIMO4BTKYQCGUDMHO3AXP
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4ZQGHE3WTYLYAYJEIDJVF2FIGQTAYPMC
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CMNFX5MNYRWWIMO4BTKYQCGUDMHO3AXP
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Aug/24
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Aug/43
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Sep/18
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190823-0005
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K50233772
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K50233772?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K50233772?utm_source=f5support&utm_medium=RSS
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4308-1
- https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4508
- https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4520
- https://www.synology.com/security/advisory/Synology_SA_19_33
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2766
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2796
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2861
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2955
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3892
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4018
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4019
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4020
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4021
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4040
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4041
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4042
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4045
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4352
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0727
- https://github.com/Netflix/security-bulletins/blob/master/advisories/third-party/2019-002.md
- https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/605641
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10296
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/392108390cef48af647a2e47b7fd5380e050e35ae8d1aa2030254c04%40%3Cusers.trafficserver.apache.org%3E
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16
Связанные уязвимости
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potent ...
Уязвимость компонента connection.c сетевого протокола HTTP/2 веб-сервера Apache Traffic Server, веб-сервера H2O, программной платформы Node.js, сетевого программного средства SwiftNIO, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании