Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

github логотип

GHSA-92vj-g62v-jqhh

Опубликовано: 12 сент. 2025
Источник: github
Github: Прошло ревью
CVSS3: 5.3

Описание

Hono has Body Limit Middleware Bypass

Summary

A flaw in the bodyLimit middleware could allow bypassing the configured request body size limit when conflicting HTTP headers were present.

Details

The middleware previously prioritized the Content-Length header even when a Transfer-Encoding: chunked header was also included. According to the HTTP specification, Content-Length must be ignored in such cases. This discrepancy could allow oversized request bodies to bypass the configured limit.

Most standards-compliant runtimes and reverse proxies may reject such malformed requests with 400 Bad Request, so the practical impact depends on the runtime and deployment environment.

Impact

If body size limits are used as a safeguard against large or malicious requests, this flaw could allow attackers to send oversized request bodies. The primary risk is denial of service (DoS) due to excessive memory or CPU consumption when handling very large requests.

Resolution

The implementation has been updated to align with the HTTP specification, ensuring that Transfer-Encoding takes precedence over Content-Length. The issue is fixed in Hono v4.9.7, and all users should upgrade immediately.

Пакеты

Наименование

hono

npm
Затронутые версииВерсия исправления

< 4.9.7

4.9.7

EPSS

Процентиль: 34%
0.00139
Низкий

5.3 Medium

CVSS3

Дефекты

CWE-400
CWE-770

Связанные уязвимости

CVSS3: 5.3
nvd
5 месяцев назад

Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. In versions prior to 4.9.7, a flaw in the `bodyLimit` middleware could allow bypassing the configured request body size limit when conflicting HTTP headers were present. The middleware previously prioritized the `Content-Length` header even when a `Transfer-Encoding: chunked` header was also included. According to the HTTP specification, `Content-Length` must be ignored in such cases. This discrepancy could allow oversized request bodies to bypass the configured limit. Most standards-compliant runtimes and reverse proxies may reject such malformed requests with `400 Bad Request`, so the practical impact depends on the runtime and deployment environment. If body size limits are used as a safeguard against large or malicious requests, this flaw could allow attackers to send oversized request bodies. The primary risk is denial of service (DoS) due to excessive memory or CPU consumption when handling very

EPSS

Процентиль: 34%
0.00139
Низкий

5.3 Medium

CVSS3

Дефекты

CWE-400
CWE-770