Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

github логотип

GHSA-cvj7-5f3c-9vg9

Опубликовано: 24 мая 2022
Источник: github
Github: Прошло ревью
CVSS3: 7.5

Описание

AttesterSlashing number overflow

Impact

Possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing being included on-chain.

Since we represent uint64 values as native javascript numbers, there is an issue when those variables with large (greater than 2^53) uint64 values are included on chain. In those cases, Lodestar may view valid AttesterSlashing or ProposerSlashing as invalid, due to rounding errors in large number values. This causes a consensus split, where Lodestar nodes are forked away from the main network.

Similarly Lodestar may consider invalid ProposerSlashing as valid, thus including in proposed blocks that will be considered invalid by the network.

Patches

https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/3977

Workarounds

Use BigInt to represent Slot and Epoch values in AttesterSlashing and ProposerSlashing objects. BigInt is too slow to be used in all Slot and Epoch cases, so we will carefully use BigInt just where necessary for consensus.

Пакеты

Наименование

@chainsafe/lodestar

npm
Затронутые версииВерсия исправления

< 0.36.0

0.36.0

EPSS

Процентиль: 52%
0.00289
Низкий

7.5 High

CVSS3

Дефекты

CWE-190

Связанные уязвимости

CVSS3: 7.5
nvd
больше 3 лет назад

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted `AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` being included on-chain. Because the developers represent `uint64` values as native javascript `number`s, there is an issue when those variables with large (greater than 2^53) `uint64` values are included on chain. In those cases, Lodestar may view valid_`AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` as invalid, due to rounding errors in large `number` values. This causes a consensus split, where Lodestar nodes are forked away from the main network. Similarly, Lodestar may consider invalid `ProposerSlashing` as valid, thus including in proposed blocks that will be considered invalid by the network. Version 0.36.0 contains a fix for this issue. As a workaround, use `BigInt` to represent `Slot` and `Epoch` values in `AttesterSlashing` and `ProposerSlashing` objects. `BigInt` is too slow t

EPSS

Процентиль: 52%
0.00289
Низкий

7.5 High

CVSS3

Дефекты

CWE-190