Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

github логотип

GHSA-g3xr-5w5j-w4q4

Опубликовано: 02 июл. 2026
Источник: github
Github: Прошло ревью
CVSS3: 6.5

Описание

Contour has Improper JWT Verification for Non-SNI Requests on Virtual Hosts with Fallback Certificate Enabled

Impact

When an HTTPProxy is configured with incompatible combination of both .spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true and .spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders, Contour does not reject the configuration. Consequently, requests from clients that do not send TLS SNI or send an unrecognized SNI (one that does not match any HTTPProxy FQDN) bypass configured JWT verification and are proxied to upstream services without a valid token.

To list all HTTPProxies with this invalid configuration, run

kubectl get httpproxies -A -o json | jq -r ' .items[] | select(.spec.virtualhost | .tls.enableFallbackCertificate and .jwtProviders) | "Invalid HTTPProxy found: \(.metadata.namespace)/\(.metadata.name)" '

Patches

This issue is fixed in Contour v1.33.5. Contour now rejects and marks invalid any HTTPProxy resources that combine .spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true with .spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders. Affected resources will receive a status condition with the error reason TLSIncompatibleFeatures.

Workarounds

Do not enable .spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate on HTTPProxy resources that also define .spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders. Remove one of the two settings to avoid the invalid configuration.

References

Пакеты

Наименование

github.com/projectcontour/contour

go
Затронутые версииВерсия исправления

>= 1.23.0, < 1.33.5

1.33.5

6.5 Medium

CVSS3

Дефекты

CWE-295

Связанные уязвимости

CVSS3: 6.5
redhat
около 1 месяца назад

A flaw was found in Contour. When an HTTPProxy is configured with both a fallback certificate and JWT (JSON Web Token) providers, Contour does not properly enforce JWT verification. This allows remote attackers to bypass security checks by sending requests without a valid token, specifically when clients do not provide a TLS Server Name Indication (SNI) or provide an unrecognized SNI. The consequence is unauthorized access to upstream services and potential information disclosure.

6.5 Medium

CVSS3

Дефекты

CWE-295