Описание
etcd's WAL ReadAll method vulnerable to an entry with large index causing panic
Vulnerability type
Data Validation
Detail
In the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the entry.
References
Find out more on this vulnerability in the security audit report
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Contact the etcd security committee
Ссылки
- https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-m332-53r6-2w93
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15112
- https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/11793
- https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/commit/7d1cf640497cbcdfb932e619b13624112c7e3865
- https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/commit/f4b650b51dc4a53a8700700dc12e1242ac56ba07
- https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/security/SECURITY_AUDIT.pdf
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L6B6R43Y7M3DCHWK3L3UVGE2K6WWECMP
- https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2020-0005
Пакеты
go.etcd.io/etcd/v3
< 3.3.23
3.3.23
go.etcd.io/etcd/v3
>= 3.4.0, < 3.4.10
3.4.10
Связанные уязвимости
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the entry.
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the entry.
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the entry.
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an e ...