Описание
The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment.
The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment.
Ссылки
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0195
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103598
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=1632ef744872edc2aa2a53d487d3e79c965a4ad3
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=1632ef744872edc2aa2a53d487d3e79c965a4ad3
- https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05301946
- https://kb.bluecoat.com/index?page=content&id=SA80
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10075
- https://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=7015271
- http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory9.asc
- http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/HP-Security-Research-Blog/Once-Bled-Twice-Shy-OpenSSL-CVE-2014-0195/ba-p/6501048
- http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/HP-Security-Research-Blog/ZDI-14-173-CVE-2014-0195-OpenSSL-DTLS-Fragment-Out-of-Bounds/ba-p/6501002
- http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10629
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136470.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136473.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00016.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140266410314613&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140317760000786&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140389274407904&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140389355508263&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140431828824371&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140448122410568&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140482916501310&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140491231331543&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140499827729550&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140621259019789&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140752315422991&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140904544427729&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142660345230545&w=2
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Dec/23
- http://secunia.com/advisories/58337
- http://secunia.com/advisories/58615
- http://secunia.com/advisories/58660
- http://secunia.com/advisories/58713
- http://secunia.com/advisories/58714
- http://secunia.com/advisories/58743
- http://secunia.com/advisories/58883
- http://secunia.com/advisories/58939
- http://secunia.com/advisories/58945
- http://secunia.com/advisories/58977
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59040
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59126
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59162
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59175
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59188
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59189
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59192
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59223
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59287
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59300
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59301
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59305
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59306
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59310
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59342
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59364
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59365
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59413
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59429
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59437
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59441
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59449
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59450
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59451
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59454
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59490
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59491
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59514
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59518
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59528
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59530
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59587
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59655
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59659
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59666
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59669
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59721
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59784
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59895
- http://secunia.com/advisories/59990
- http://secunia.com/advisories/60571
- http://secunia.com/advisories/61254
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201407-05.xml
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6443
- http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX140876
- http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/15000/300/sol15356.html
- http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20140605-openssl
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg400001841
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg400001843
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1020163
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21673137
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21675821
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21676035
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21676062
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21676071
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21676419
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21676644
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21676879
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21676889
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21677527
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21677695
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21677828
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21678167
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21678289
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21683332
- http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/docdisplay?lndocid=MIGR-5095754
- http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/docdisplay?lndocid=MIGR-5095755
- http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/docdisplay?lndocid=MIGR-5095756
- http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/docdisplay?lndocid=MIGR-5095757
- http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/KB36051
- http://www.f-secure.com/en/web/labs_global/fsc-2014-6
- http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-14-018
- http://www.huawei.com/en/security/psirt/security-bulletins/security-advisories/hw-345106.htm
- http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21676356
- http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21676793
- http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg24037783
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2014:106
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:062
- http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140605.txt
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2015-1972971.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2014-1972956.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuoct2014-1972960.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/534161/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/67900
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1030337
- http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2014-0006.html
- http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2014-0012.html
Связанные уязвимости
The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment.
The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment.
The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment.
The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before ...
Уязвимость программного обеспечения OpenSSL, позволяющая удаленному злоумышленнику нарушить конфиденциальность, целостность и доступность защищаемой информации