Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

github логотип

GHSA-r78f-4q2q-hvv4

Опубликовано: 16 янв. 2024
Источник: github
Github: Прошло ревью
CVSS3: 6.5

Описание

CL-Signatures Revocation Scheme in Ursa has flaws that allow a holder to demonstrate non-revocation of a revoked credential

Summary

The revocation schema that is part of the Ursa CL-Signatures implementations has a flaw that could impact the privacy guarantees defined by the AnonCreds verifiable credential model, allowing a malicious holder of a revoked credential to generate a valid Non-Revocation Proof for that credential as part of an AnonCreds presentation.

Details

The revocation schema that is part of the Ursa CL-Signatures implementation has a flaw that could impact the privacy guarantees defined by the AnonCreds verifiable credential model, allowing a malicious holder of a revoked credential to generate a valid Non-Revocation Proof for that credential as part of an AnonCreds presentation.

The flaw exists in all CL-Signature versions published from the Hyperledger Ursa repository to the Ursa Rust Crate, and are fixed in all versions published from the Hyperledger AnonCreds CL-Signatures repository to the AnonCreds CL-Signatures Rust Crate.

To exploit the flaw, a holder must update their wallet (agent) software, replacing the Hyperledger Ursa or AnonCreds CL-Signatures library that generates the proof of non-revocation. This may involve, for example, altering an iOS or Android application published in the respective app stores. A mitigation for this flaw is to use the application attestation capabilities (such as the Android "SafetyNet Attestation API") offered by the app store vendors to (for example) "help determine whether your servers are interacting with your genuine app running on a genuine Android device."

The problem is created in the generation of a revocation registry, prior to issuing any credentials. As such, to eliminate the impact of the flaw, the issued credentials must be re-issued based on a correct revocation registry, generated from a correct implementation, such as Hyperledger AnonCreds CL-Signatures.

Impact

The potential impact is as follows:

  • A verifier may verify a credential from a holder as being "not revoked" when in fact, the holder's credential has been revoked.

Mitigation

Upgrade libraries/applications using the Ursa Rust Crate to any version of the AnonCreds CL-Signatures Rust Crate. If your application has issued revocable credentials, once the Issuer library has been upgraded, new revocation registries must be created, and credentials issued from revocation registries created with the the flawed software must be revoked and reissued.

A verifier can detect if a holder presents a flawed revocable credential.

Пакеты

Наименование

ursa

rust
Затронутые версииВерсия исправления

<= 0.3.7

Отсутствует

Наименование

anoncreds-clsignatures

rust
Затронутые версииВерсия исправления

Отсутствует

EPSS

Процентиль: 31%
0.0012
Низкий

6.5 Medium

CVSS3

Дефекты

CWE-327

Связанные уязвимости

CVSS3: 6.5
nvd
около 2 лет назад

Ursa is a cryptographic library for use with blockchains. The revocation schema that is part of the Ursa CL-Signatures implementations has a flaw that could impact the privacy guarantees defined by the AnonCreds verifiable credential model, allowing a malicious holder of a revoked credential to generate a valid Non-Revocation Proof for that credential as part of an AnonCreds presentation. A verifier may verify a credential from a holder as being "not revoked" when in fact, the holder's credential has been revoked. Ursa has moved to end-of-life status and no fix is expected.

EPSS

Процентиль: 31%
0.0012
Низкий

6.5 Medium

CVSS3

Дефекты

CWE-327