Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

github логотип

GHSA-wmv4-5w76-vp9g

Опубликовано: 15 сент. 2020
Источник: github
Github: Прошло ревью
CVSS3: 9.8

Описание

Authorization Bypass in Spring Security

When using Spring Security's CAS Proxy ticket authentication a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request.

This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed.

If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users.

Mitigation

Users of affected versions should apply the following mitigation:

  • Users of 3.2x should upgrade to 3.2.5 or later
  • Users of 3.1.x should upgrade to 3.1.7 or later

Credit

This issue was identified by David Ohsie and brought to our attention by the CAS Development team.

Пакеты

Наименование

org.springframework.security:spring-security-core

maven
Затронутые версииВерсия исправления

< 3.1.7

3.1.7

Наименование

org.springframework.security:spring-security-core

maven
Затронутые версииВерсия исправления

>= 3.2.0, < 3.2.5

3.2.5

EPSS

Процентиль: 58%
0.00359
Низкий

9.8 Critical

CVSS3

Дефекты

CWE-287

Связанные уязвимости

CVSS3: 9.8
ubuntu
больше 8 лет назад

When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3.1 to 3.2.4 a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request. This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed. If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users.

redhat
больше 11 лет назад

When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3.1 to 3.2.4 a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request. This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed. If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users.

CVSS3: 9.8
nvd
больше 8 лет назад

When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3.1 to 3.2.4 a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request. This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed. If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users.

CVSS3: 9.8
debian
больше 8 лет назад

When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3. ...

EPSS

Процентиль: 58%
0.00359
Низкий

9.8 Critical

CVSS3

Дефекты

CWE-287