Описание
File Browser: Authentication Bypass via Proxy Auth Header Forgery
Summary
When FileBrowser is configured with proxy authentication (auth.method=proxy), any unauthenticated attacker who can reach the server directly can impersonate any user - including admin - by sending a single forged HTTP header. No credentials are required. Additionally, specifying a non-existent username causes the server to automatically create a new user account, providing an account creation primitive with no authorization.
This is an already known issue that has been documented in the documentation for several years, but has not been documented as a vulnerability before.
Severity
HIGH - CVSS 3.1: 8.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N)
Affected Component
- File:
auth/proxy.go, lines 21-28 - CWE: CWE-287 (Improper Authentication), CWE-290 (Authentication Bypass by Spoofing)
- Affected versions: All versions supporting
auth.method=proxy
Prerequisite: Proxy Auth Must Be Enabled
This vulnerability is NOT exploitable on default configuration (auth.method=json). It requires the administrator to have configured proxy authentication mode. However, this is a common production deployment pattern - many organizations run FileBrowser behind a reverse proxy that handles SSO/LDAP/OAuth authentication:
- nginx + Authelia / Authentik
- Traefik + OAuth2 Proxy
- Caddy + forward_auth
- Apache + mod_auth_ldap
In these setups, the proxy authenticates the user and passes the username via HTTP header (e.g., X-Remote-User). FileBrowser trusts this header to identify the user.
| Deployment Scenario | Exploitable? |
|---|---|
Default install (auth.method=json) | No — JSON auth uses password verification |
auth.method=proxy + FileBrowser only reachable via proxy (bound to 127.0.0.1 or firewalled) | No - attacker cannot reach the server directly |
auth.method=proxy + FileBrowser port exposed to network | Yes - full admin takeover |
The third scenario is common because:
- Docker containers publish ports to
0.0.0.0by default (e.g.,-p 8085:80) - Administrators expose the port for debugging, monitoring, or health checks
- Cloud deployments may have misconfigured security groups or load balancers
- Internal networks often lack strict micro-segmentation
The core issue is that the code itself has zero defensive checks — no trusted IP validation, no shared secret, no origin verification. The entire security model relies on network-level isolation, which is fragile and not documented as a hard requirement.
Root Cause
The ProxyAuth.Auth() function unconditionally trusts the value of an HTTP request header (configured via auth.header, e.g. X-Remote-User) to determine the authenticated user's identity. There are three distinct problems in this code:
Problem 1: No Origin Validation
The function reads the header from any HTTP request regardless of source IP. It does not verify that the request originated from a trusted reverse proxy. Any client on the network can set arbitrary HTTP headers.
File: auth/proxy.go, lines 21-28:
There is no call to verify r.RemoteAddr against a list of trusted proxy IPs, no shared secret validation, and no signature check on the header value.
Problem 2: No Password Verification
Unlike JSON auth (auth/json.go) which validates the password via bcrypt, the proxy auth path returns the user object directly from the database based solely on the header value. The loginHandler in http/auth.go then mints a valid JWT for this user:
File: http/auth.go, lines 121-137:
Problem 3: Automatic User Creation
If the username in the header doesn't exist in the database, createUser() is called unconditionally. This creates a real user account with default permissions, a random locked password, and a home directory:
File: auth/proxy.go, lines 30-63:
This auto-creation has no opt-in flag — it is always active when proxy auth is enabled.
Complete Attack Flow
Proof of Concept
Here is Log testing using Low Privileges Account attacker, get forbidden
Login as low priv user then get the auth token "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.NN0SqBr8lFj7QUACY2770gaGXZhBZ2qJZHDJJ7vQbNM"
Prerequisites
- FileBrowser with proxy auth enabled:
filebrowser config set --auth.method=proxy --auth.header=X-Remote-User
- Server is reachable directly (not exclusively behind the reverse proxy)
Step 1: Confirm attacker (non-admin) is blocked
Result: 403 Forbidden — non-admin users cannot access /api/settings
Step 2: Forge admin identity — no credentials needed
Result: Valid JWT token returned for admin user (ID: 1, perm.admin: true)
Step 3: Access admin-only endpoints with forged token
Result: 200 OK - complete server settings returned:
Step 4: Enumerate all user accounts
Result: All user accounts with full details (usernames, permissions, scopes, commands)
Step 5: Impersonate any other user
Result: Full file listing of testuser's scope
Step 6: Auto-create a new user account
Result: New user backdoor_account created in the database with default permissions, JWT returned
Validated Results
Tested against filebrowser/filebrowser:latest Docker image on 2026-03-09:
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
Attacker token (non-admin) -> GET /api/settings | 403 Forbidden (blocked) |
Forged header X-Remote-User: admin -> POST /api/login | 200 OK — valid admin JWT (608 bytes) |
Forged admin token -> GET /api/settings | 200 OK — full server config returned |
Forged admin token -> GET /api/users | 200 OK — all user accounts listed |
Forged header X-Remote-User: testuser | 200 OK — testuser JWT, files accessible |
Forged header X-Remote-User: nonexistent_user | 200 OK — new user auto-created, JWT returned |
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker who can reach the FileBrowser instance directly can:
- Full admin takeover — impersonate the admin user and gain complete control
- Read all server settings — shell configuration, permissions, branding, rules
- Enumerate and impersonate all users — access every user's files without credentials
- Create unlimited backdoor accounts — auto-creation generates persistent accounts
- Modify server configuration — enable command execution, change shell, alter rules
- Chain with other vulnerabilities — gain admin access -> enable shell mode -> achieve RCE
Attack cost: Zero credentials. One HTTP header.
Suggested Remediation
Fix 1: Add trusted proxy IP validation (recommended)
Fix 2: Make auto-user-creation opt-in
Add a configuration flag auth.proxy.createUsers (default: false) so administrators must explicitly enable automatic account creation.
Fix 3: Documentation warning
Clearly document that when using proxy auth:
- FileBrowser MUST NOT be directly accessible from untrusted networks
- Bind to
127.0.0.1or use firewall rules to ensure only the reverse proxy can reach it - The reverse proxy MUST strip/overwrite the configured header from client requests
References
- Source file: https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/main/auth/proxy.go
- Login handler: https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/main/http/auth.go#L121-L137
- CWE-287: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/287.html
- CWE-290: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/290.html
- OWASP Authentication Cheat Sheet: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Authentication_Cheat_Sheet.html
Пакеты
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2
>= 2.0.0-rc.1, <= 2.63.18
Отсутствует
Связанные уязвимости
File Browser is a file managing interface for uploading, deleting, previewing, renaming, and editing files within a specified directory. Starting with 2.0.0-rc.1, when FileBrowser is configured with proxy authentication (auth.method=proxy), any unauthenticated attacker who can reach the server directly can impersonate any user - including admin - by sending a single forged HTTP header. No credentials are required. Additionally, specifying a non-existent username causes the server to automatically create a new user account, providing an account creation primitive with no authorization. This is an already known issue that has been documented in the documentation for several years, but has not been documented as a vulnerability before.