Описание
MITRE: CVE-2023-50868 NSEC3 closest encloser proof can exhaust CPU
FAQ
Why is the MITRE Corporation the assigning CNA (CVE Numbering Authority)?
CVE-2023-50868 is regarding a vulnerability in DNSSEC validation where an attacker could exploit standard DNSSEC protocols intended for DNS integrity by using excessive resources on a resolver, causing a denial of service for legitimate users. MITRE created this CVE on their behalf.
Please see CVE-2023-50868 for more information.
Обновления
| Продукт | Статья | Обновление |
|---|---|---|
| Windows Server 2012 | ||
| Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) | ||
| Windows Server 2012 R2 | ||
| Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) | ||
| Windows Server 2016 | ||
| Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) | ||
| Windows Server 2019 | ||
| Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) | ||
| Windows Server 2022 | ||
| Windows Server 2022 (Server Core installation) |
Показывать по
Возможность эксплуатации
Publicly Disclosed
Exploited
Latest Software Release
DOS
EPSS
7.5 High
CVSS3
Связанные уязвимости
The Closest Encloser Proof aspect of the DNS protocol (in RFC 5155 when RFC 9276 guidance is skipped) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption for SHA-1 computations) via DNSSEC responses in a random subdomain attack, aka the "NSEC3" issue. The RFC 5155 specification implies that an algorithm must perform thousands of iterations of a hash function in certain situations.
The Closest Encloser Proof aspect of the DNS protocol (in RFC 5155 when RFC 9276 guidance is skipped) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption for SHA-1 computations) via DNSSEC responses in a random subdomain attack, aka the "NSEC3" issue. The RFC 5155 specification implies that an algorithm must perform thousands of iterations of a hash function in certain situations.
The Closest Encloser Proof aspect of the DNS protocol (in RFC 5155 when RFC 9276 guidance is skipped) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption for SHA-1 computations) via DNSSEC responses in a random subdomain attack, aka the "NSEC3" issue. The RFC 5155 specification implies that an algorithm must perform thousands of iterations of a hash function in certain situations.
The Closest Encloser Proof aspect of the DNS protocol (in RFC 5155 whe ...
The Closest Encloser Proof aspect of the DNS protocol (in RFC 5155 when RFC 9276 guidance is skipped) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption for SHA-1 computations) via DNSSEC responses in a random subdomain attack, aka the "NSEC3" issue. The RFC 5155 specification implies that an algorithm must perform thousands of iterations of a hash function in certain situations.
EPSS
7.5 High
CVSS3