Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

msrc логотип

CVE-2026-89948

Опубликовано: 17 сент. 2026
Источник: msrc
CVSS3: 7.1
EPSS Низкий

Описание

batman-adv: bla: fix freeing of claims on meshif deletion

Обновления

ПродуктСтатьяОбновление
azl3 kernel 6.6.150.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0

Показывать по

EPSS

Процентиль: 12%
0.00211
Низкий

7.1 High

CVSS3

Связанные уязвимости

ubuntu
5 дней назад

(In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: b ...)

nvd
6 дней назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: batman-adv: bla: fix freeing of claims on meshif deletion When the mesh interface is getting deleted, then batadv_bla_del_backbone_claims() (via batadv_bla_purge_backbone_gw()) could make sure that all claims gets removed. But this function is only executed when bat_priv->bla.claim_hash is not NULL. And since batadv_bla_free() is always setting it to NULL before it is (indirectly) called, it was never actually executed. But the batadv_bla_purge_claims() -> batadv_handle_unclaim() is at the moment too fragile because the BLA code is not handling the rehashing in batadv_bla_update_orig_address(). The stored backbone address doesn't have to be the one actually used for the hash bucket selection during the initial adding of the backbone. The batadv_handle_unclaim() can therefore fail to find the respective backbone for the unclaim and then stop the deletion. But the actual backbone_gw object is not needed for the uncla

debian
6 дней назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: b ...

github
6 дней назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: batman-adv: bla: fix freeing of claims on meshif deletion When the mesh interface is getting deleted, then batadv_bla_del_backbone_claims() (via batadv_bla_purge_backbone_gw()) could make sure that all claims gets removed. But this function is only executed when bat_priv->bla.claim_hash is not NULL. And since batadv_bla_free() is always setting it to NULL before it is (indirectly) called, it was never actually executed. But the batadv_bla_purge_claims() -> batadv_handle_unclaim() is at the moment too fragile because the BLA code is not handling the rehashing in batadv_bla_update_orig_address(). The stored backbone address doesn't have to be the one actually used for the hash bucket selection during the initial adding of the backbone. The batadv_handle_unclaim() can therefore fail to find the respective backbone for the unclaim and then stop the deletion. But the actual backbone_gw object is not needed for the un...

EPSS

Процентиль: 12%
0.00211
Низкий

7.1 High

CVSS3