Описание
An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would otherwise be denied via a simple bind for any identity covered in those ACLs. After the first SASL bind is completed, the sasl_ssf value is retained for all new non-SASL connections. Depending on the ACL configuration, this can affect different types of operations (searches, modifications, etc.). In other words, a successful authorization step completed by one user affects the authorization requirement for a different user.
Ссылки
- Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
- Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
- Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
- Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
- Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
- Third Party Advisory
- Third Party Advisory
- Third Party Advisory
- Mailing ListVendor Advisory
- Mailing ListVendor Advisory
- PatchThird Party Advisory
- PatchThird Party Advisory
- Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
- Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
- Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
Уязвимые конфигурации
Одно из
Одно из
Одно из
Одно из
Одно из
EPSS
7.5 High
CVSS3
5 Medium
CVSS2
Дефекты
Связанные уязвимости
An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would otherwise be denied via a simple bind for any identity covered in those ACLs. After the first SASL bind is completed, the sasl_ssf value is retained for all new non-SASL connections. Depending on the ACL configuration, this can affect different types of operations (searches, modifications, etc.). In other words, a successful authorization step completed by one user affects the authorization requirement for a different user.
An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would otherwise be denied via a simple bind for any identity covered in those ACLs. After the first SASL bind is completed, the sasl_ssf value is retained for all new non-SASL connections. Depending on the ACL configuration, this can affect different types of operations (searches, modifications, etc.). In other words, a successful authorization step completed by one user affects the authorization requirement for a different user.
An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL ...
An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would otherwise be denied via a simple bind for any identity covered in those ACLs. After the first SASL bind is completed, the sasl_ssf value is retained for all new non-SASL connections. Depending on the ACL configuration, this can affect different types of operations (searches, modifications, etc.). In other words, a successful authorization step completed by one user affects the authorization requirement for a different user.
Уязвимость пакета OpenLDAP, связанная с ошибками реализации процедуры аутентификации, позволяющая нарушителю раскрыть защищаемую информацию
EPSS
7.5 High
CVSS3
5 Medium
CVSS2