Описание
Waitress through version 1.3.1 implemented a "MAY" part of the RFC7230 which states: "Although the line terminator for the start-line and header fields is the sequence CRLF, a recipient MAY recognize a single LF as a line terminator and ignore any preceding CR." Unfortunately if a front-end server does not parse header fields with an LF the same way as it does those with a CRLF it can lead to the front-end and the back-end server parsing the same HTTP message in two different ways. This can lead to a potential for HTTP request smuggling/splitting whereby Waitress may see two requests while the front-end server only sees a single HTTP message. This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0.
Ссылки
- Third Party Advisory
- Vendor Advisory
- PatchThird Party Advisory
- ExploitThird Party Advisory
- Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
- PatchThird Party Advisory
- Third Party Advisory
- Vendor Advisory
- PatchThird Party Advisory
- ExploitThird Party Advisory
- Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
- PatchThird Party Advisory
Уязвимые конфигурации
Одно из
EPSS
7.1 High
CVSS3
7.5 High
CVSS3
5 Medium
CVSS2
Дефекты
Связанные уязвимости
Waitress through version 1.3.1 implemented a "MAY" part of the RFC7230 which states: "Although the line terminator for the start-line and header fields is the sequence CRLF, a recipient MAY recognize a single LF as a line terminator and ignore any preceding CR." Unfortunately if a front-end server does not parse header fields with an LF the same way as it does those with a CRLF it can lead to the front-end and the back-end server parsing the same HTTP message in two different ways. This can lead to a potential for HTTP request smuggling/splitting whereby Waitress may see two requests while the front-end server only sees a single HTTP message. This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0.
Waitress through version 1.3.1 implemented a "MAY" part of the RFC7230 which states: "Although the line terminator for the start-line and header fields is the sequence CRLF, a recipient MAY recognize a single LF as a line terminator and ignore any preceding CR." Unfortunately if a front-end server does not parse header fields with an LF the same way as it does those with a CRLF it can lead to the front-end and the back-end server parsing the same HTTP message in two different ways. This can lead to a potential for HTTP request smuggling/splitting whereby Waitress may see two requests while the front-end server only sees a single HTTP message. This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0.
Waitress through version 1.3.1 implemented a "MAY" part of the RFC7230 ...
HTTP Request Smuggling: LF vs CRLF handling in Waitress
Уязвимость WSGI сервера для python Waitress, связанная с недостатками обработки HTTP-запросов, позволяющая нарушителю оказать воздействие на целостность данных
EPSS
7.1 High
CVSS3
7.5 High
CVSS3
5 Medium
CVSS2