Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

nvd логотип

CVE-2026-89985

Опубликовано: 16 сент. 2026
Источник: nvd
CVSS3: 7.8
EPSS Низкий

Описание

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

memcg: keep folio's objcg same as its node

memcg_reparent_objcgs() has an inherent assumption that a folio's objcg is the objcg of the folio's node. Folio migration across nodes breaks that assumption: the new folio simply inherits the old folio's objcg while living on a different node.

Once the assumption is broken, the reparenting of the folio's objcg and the reparenting of the folio's LRU list are no longer atomic. memcg_reparent_objcgs() handles one node per iteration and drops all the locks in between, so the objcg gets reparented in the iteration for the objcg's node while the LRU list gets spliced in the iteration for the folio's node. Any LRU operation on that folio in between resolves its lruvec through the objcg, and thus takes the lru_lock of the wrong memcg, not the lru_lock of the list the folio is actually on.

Fix this by selecting the objcg by folio_nid() at charge time, and by re-deriving it for

EPSS

Процентиль: 5%
0.00154
Низкий

7.8 High

CVSS3

Дефекты

Связанные уязвимости

CVSS3: 7.8
ubuntu
5 дней назад

(In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: m ...)

CVSS3: 7.8
debian
6 дней назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: m ...

CVSS3: 7.8
github
6 дней назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memcg: keep folio's objcg same as its node memcg_reparent_objcgs() has an inherent assumption that a folio's objcg is the objcg of the folio's node. Folio migration across nodes breaks that assumption: the new folio simply inherits the old folio's objcg while living on a different node. Once the assumption is broken, the reparenting of the folio's objcg and the reparenting of the folio's LRU list are no longer atomic. memcg_reparent_objcgs() handles one node per iteration and drops all the locks in between, so the objcg gets reparented in the iteration for the objcg's node while the LRU list gets spliced in the iteration for the folio's node. Any LRU operation on that folio in between resolves its lruvec through the objcg, and thus takes the lru_lock of the wrong memcg, not the lru_lock of the list the folio is actually on. Fix this by selecting the objcg by folio_nid() at charge time, and by re-deriving it f...

EPSS

Процентиль: 5%
0.00154
Низкий

7.8 High

CVSS3

Дефекты