Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

nvd логотип

CVE-2026-90895

Опубликовано: 14 сент. 2026
Источник: nvd
EPSS Низкий

Описание

Affected versions of MISP’s interactive CLI shell implement access control independently from the normal web application, causing several authorization inconsistencies.

The patch shows that CLI access could differ from the web application in multiple security-sensitive areas:

 - feed listings did not enforce the same lookup_visible restrictions for non-host-organisation users;  - feed detail access did not enforce the same host-organisation/site-admin authorization as FeedsController::view();  - Feed.headers, which can contain HTTP authorization credentials, could be exposed instead of being hidden or masked;  - server synchronization authkey values were not explicitly hidden from CLI detail output;  - sharing-group detail access did not consistently use SharingGroup::checkIfAuthorised();  - the use command could establish context for a record without first proving that the user was authorized to view that record

The commit additionally hardens pagination and termina

EPSS

Процентиль: 5%
0.00154
Низкий

Дефекты

CWE-150

Связанные уязвимости

debian
3 дня назад

Affected versions of MISP\u2019s interactive CLI shell implement acces ...

github
3 дня назад

Affected versions of MISP’s interactive CLI shell implement access control independently from the normal web application, causing several authorization inconsistencies. The patch shows that CLI access could differ from the web application in multiple security-sensitive areas:  - feed listings did not enforce the same lookup_visible restrictions for non-host-organisation users;  - feed detail access did not enforce the same host-organisation/site-admin authorization as FeedsController::view();  - Feed.headers, which can contain HTTP authorization credentials, could be exposed instead of being hidden or masked;  - server synchronization authkey values were not explicitly hidden from CLI detail output;  - sharing-group detail access did not consistently use SharingGroup::checkIfAuthorised();  - the use command could establish context for a record without first proving that the user was authorized to view that record The commit additionally hardens pagination and term...

EPSS

Процентиль: 5%
0.00154
Низкий

Дефекты

CWE-150