Описание
ELSA-2024-12056: openssl security update (MODERATE)
[1:1.1.1k-12]
- Backport implicit rejection mechanism for RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 to RHEL-8 series (a proper fix for CVE-2020-25659) Resolves: RHEL-17696
[1:1.1.1k-11]
- Fix CVE-2023-5678: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow Resolves: RHEL-16538
[1:1.1.1k-10]
- Fix CVE-2023-3446: Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters Resolves: RHEL-14245
- Fix CVE-2023-3817: Excessive time spent checking DH q parameter value Resolves: RHEL-14239
Обновленные пакеты
Oracle Linux 8
Oracle Linux aarch64
openssl
1.1.1k-12.ksplice1.el8_9
openssl-devel
1.1.1k-12.ksplice1.el8_9
openssl-libs
1.1.1k-12.ksplice1.el8_9
openssl-perl
1.1.1k-12.ksplice1.el8_9
openssl-static
1.1.1k-12.ksplice1.el8_9
Oracle Linux x86_64
openssl
1.1.1k-12.ksplice1.el8_9
openssl-devel
1.1.1k-12.ksplice1.el8_9
openssl-libs
1.1.1k-12.ksplice1.el8_9
openssl-perl
1.1.1k-12.ksplice1.el8_9
Связанные CVE
Связанные уязвимости
ELSA-2024-2447: openssl and openssl-fips-provider security update (LOW)
Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtained ...
Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtained...
Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtaine