Описание
ELSA-2024-3755: idm:DL1 security update (IMPORTANT)
bind-dyndb-ldap custodia ipa [4.9.13-10.0.1]
- Set IPAPLATFORM=rhel when build on Oracle Linux [Orabug: 29516674]
[4.9.13-10]
- kdb: apply combinatorial logic for ticket flags (CVE-2024-3183) Resolves: RHEL-29927
- kdb: fix vulnerability in GCD rules handling (CVE-2024-2698) Resolves: RHEL-29692
ipa-healthcheck opendnssec python-jwcrypto python-kdcproxy python-qrcode python-yubico pyusb slapi-nis softhsm
Обновленные пакеты
Oracle Linux 8
Oracle Linux aarch64
Module idm:DL1 is enabled
bind-dyndb-ldap
11.6-5.module+el8.10.0+90339+985471f7
custodia
0.6.0-3.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
ipa-client
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-client-common
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-client-epn
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-client-samba
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-common
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-healthcheck
0.12-3.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
ipa-healthcheck-core
0.12-3.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
ipa-python-compat
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-selinux
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-server
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-server-common
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-server-dns
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-server-trust-ad
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
opendnssec
2.1.7-1.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
python3-custodia
0.6.0-3.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
python3-ipaclient
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
python3-ipalib
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
python3-ipaserver
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
python3-ipatests
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
python3-jwcrypto
0.5.0-2.module+el8.10.0+90339+985471f7
python3-kdcproxy
0.4-5.module+el8.9.0+90122+3305dc1d
python3-pyusb
1.0.0-9.1.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
python3-qrcode
5.1-12.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
python3-qrcode-core
5.1-12.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
python3-yubico
1.3.2-9.1.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
slapi-nis
0.60.0-4.module+el8.10.0+90297+bfe93ccc
softhsm
2.6.0-5.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
softhsm-devel
2.6.0-5.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
Oracle Linux x86_64
Module idm:DL1 is enabled
bind-dyndb-ldap
11.6-5.module+el8.10.0+90339+985471f7
custodia
0.6.0-3.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
ipa-client
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-client-common
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-client-epn
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-client-samba
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-common
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-healthcheck
0.12-3.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
ipa-healthcheck-core
0.12-3.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
ipa-python-compat
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-selinux
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-server
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-server-common
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-server-dns
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
ipa-server-trust-ad
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
opendnssec
2.1.7-1.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
python3-custodia
0.6.0-3.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
python3-ipaclient
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
python3-ipalib
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
python3-ipaserver
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
python3-ipatests
4.9.13-10.0.1.module+el8.10.0+90350+f6ece971
python3-jwcrypto
0.5.0-2.module+el8.10.0+90339+985471f7
python3-kdcproxy
0.4-5.module+el8.9.0+90122+3305dc1d
python3-pyusb
1.0.0-9.1.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
python3-qrcode
5.1-12.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
python3-qrcode-core
5.1-12.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
python3-yubico
1.3.2-9.1.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
slapi-nis
0.60.0-4.module+el8.10.0+90297+bfe93ccc
softhsm
2.6.0-5.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
softhsm-devel
2.6.0-5.module+el8.9.0+90094+20819f5a
Связанные CVE
Связанные уязвимости
A vulnerability was found in FreeIPA in how the initial implementation of MS-SFU by MIT Kerberos was missing a condition for granting the "forwardable" flag on S4U2Self tickets. Fixing this mistake required adding a special case for the check_allowed_to_delegate() function: If the target service argument is NULL, then it means the KDC is probing for general constrained delegation rules and not checking a specific S4U2Proxy request. In FreeIPA 4.11.0, the behavior of ipadb_match_acl() was modified to match the changes from upstream MIT Kerberos 1.20. However, a mistake resulting in this mechanism applies in cases where the target service argument is set AND where it is unset. This results in S4U2Proxy requests being accepted regardless of whether or not there is a matching service delegation rule.
A vulnerability was found in FreeIPA in how the initial implementation of MS-SFU by MIT Kerberos was missing a condition for granting the "forwardable" flag on S4U2Self tickets. Fixing this mistake required adding a special case for the check_allowed_to_delegate() function: If the target service argument is NULL, then it means the KDC is probing for general constrained delegation rules and not checking a specific S4U2Proxy request. In FreeIPA 4.11.0, the behavior of ipadb_match_acl() was modified to match the changes from upstream MIT Kerberos 1.20. However, a mistake resulting in this mechanism applies in cases where the target service argument is set AND where it is unset. This results in S4U2Proxy requests being accepted regardless of whether or not there is a matching service delegation rule.
A vulnerability was found in FreeIPA in how the initial implementation of MS-SFU by MIT Kerberos was missing a condition for granting the "forwardable" flag on S4U2Self tickets. Fixing this mistake required adding a special case for the check_allowed_to_delegate() function: If the target service argument is NULL, then it means the KDC is probing for general constrained delegation rules and not checking a specific S4U2Proxy request. In FreeIPA 4.11.0, the behavior of ipadb_match_acl() was modified to match the changes from upstream MIT Kerberos 1.20. However, a mistake resulting in this mechanism applies in cases where the target service argument is set AND where it is unset. This results in S4U2Proxy requests being accepted regardless of whether or not there is a matching service delegation rule.