Описание
A vulnerability was found in the blk-iocost module of Linux Kernel, where a shift-out-of-bounds warning due to discrepancies in timestamp handling during CPU transitions in iocg_kick_delay(), occurred when called from a different CPU, @now could be earlier than @iocg->delay_at, triggering an out-of-bounds shift exponent error.
Меры по смягчению последствий
Red Hat has investigated whether a possible mitigation exists for this issue, and has not been able to identify a practical example. Please update the affected package as soon as possible.
Затронутые пакеты
| Платформа | Пакет | Состояние | Рекомендация | Релиз |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Not affected | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Not affected | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Affected | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Affected |
Показывать по
Дополнительная информация
Статус:
5.5 Medium
CVSS3
Связанные уязвимости
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-iocost: Fix an UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning When iocg_kick_delay() is called from a CPU different than the one which set the delay, @now may be in the past of @iocg->delay_at leading to the following warning: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in block/blk-iocost.c:1359:23 shift exponent 18446744073709 is too large for 64-bit type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long long') ... Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x79/0xc0 __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x2ab/0x300 iocg_kick_delay+0x222/0x230 ioc_rqos_merge+0x1d7/0x2c0 __rq_qos_merge+0x2c/0x80 bio_attempt_back_merge+0x83/0x190 blk_attempt_plug_merge+0x101/0x150 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x2b1/0x720 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x320/0x3e0 __swap_writepage+0x2ab/0x9d0 The underflow itself doesn't really affect the behavior in any meaningful way; however, the past timestamp may exaggerate the delay amount calculated later in the code, which s...
5.5 Medium
CVSS3