Описание
DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.
pkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.
A flaw was found in Python's pkgutil.get_data() function, which is used to retrieve data from packages. This function did not properly validate the resource argument, allowing a local attacker to perform path traversal attacks. Path traversal enables an attacker to access files and directories stored outside the intended root directory, potentially leading to information disclosure or unintended file access.
Меры по смягчению последствий
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Затронутые пакеты
| Платформа | Пакет | Состояние | Рекомендация | Релиз |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | python3.12 | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | python3.14 | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | python | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | python | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | python3 | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python3 | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python3.11 | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python3.12 | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python36:3.6/python36 | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python39-devel:3.9/python39 | Fix deferred |
Показывать по
Ссылки на источники
Дополнительная информация
Статус:
3.3 Low
CVSS3
Связанные уязвимости
DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model. pkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.
DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model. pkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.
DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorre ...
3.3 Low
CVSS3