Описание
NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 is vulnerable to poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section. Promiscuous RRSets that complement DNS replies in the authority section can be used to trick Unbound to cache such records. If an adversary is able to attach such records in a reply (i.e., spoofed packet, fragmentation attack) he would be able to poison Unbound's cache. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by injecting RRSets other than NS that are also accompanied by address records in a reply, for example MX. This could be achieved by trying to spoof a reply packet or fragmentation attacks. Unbound would then accept the relative address records in the additional section and cache them if the authority RRSet has enough trust at this point, i.e., in-zone data for the delegation point. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that disregards address records from the additional section if they are not explicitly relevant only to authority NS records, mitigating the possible poison effect. This is a complement fix to CVE-2025-11411.
A flaw was found in Unbound's handling of DNS reply messages, complementing the earlier CVE-2025-11411 fix. Unbound accepts and caches address records from the additional section of DNS replies when they accompany authority section RRSets other than NS (such as MX records). A malicious actor who can inject crafted DNS responses—via packet spoofing or fragmentation attacks—can exploit this to poison Unbound's cache with attacker-controlled address records, potentially redirecting DNS resolution for affected domains.
Отчет
The Red Hat Product Security team has assessed the severity of this vulnerability as Moderate. Exploitation requires the attacker to successfully inject or spoof DNS response packets, which increases attack complexity. However, successful exploitation can result in DNS cache poisoning, allowing the attacker to redirect DNS resolution for affected domains.
Меры по смягчению последствий
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Затронутые пакеты
| Платформа | Пакет | Состояние | Рекомендация | Релиз |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | unbound | Affected | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | unbound | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | unbound | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | unbound | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | unbound | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | rhcos | Fix deferred | ||
| Red Hat Hardened Images | unbound-main-1.25.1-1.hum1 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:20357 | 23.05.2026 |
Показывать по
Дополнительная информация
Статус:
EPSS
5.9 Medium
CVSS3
Связанные уязвимости
NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 is vulnerable to poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section. Promiscuous RRSets that complement DNS replies in the authority section can be used to trick Unbound to cache such records. If an adversary is able to attach such records in a reply (i.e., spoofed packet, fragmentation attack) he would be able to poison Unbound's cache. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by injecting RRSets other than NS that are also accompanied by address records in a reply, for example MX. This could be achieved by trying to spoof a reply packet or fragmentation attacks. Unbound would then accept the relative address records in the additional section and cache them if the authority RRSet has enough trust at this point, i.e., in-zone data for the delegation point. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that disregards address records from the additional section if they are not explicitly relevant only to a...
NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 is vulnerable to poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section. Promiscuous RRSets that complement DNS replies in the authority section can be used to trick Unbound to cache such records. If an adversary is able to attach such records in a reply (i.e., spoofed packet, fragmentation attack) he would be able to poison Unbound's cache. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by injecting RRSets other than NS that are also accompanied by address records in a reply, for example MX. This could be achieved by trying to spoof a reply packet or fragmentation attacks. Unbound would then accept the relative address records in the additional section and cache them if the authority RRSet has enough trust at this point, i.e., in-zone data for the delegation point. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that disregards address records from the additional section if they are not explicitly relevant only to auth
Possible cache poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section
NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 is vulnerable to ...
EPSS
5.9 Medium
CVSS3