Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

redhat логотип

CVE-2026-64109

Опубликовано: 19 июл. 2026
Источник: redhat
CVSS3: 4.7

Описание

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Fix UAF read of tail->len in unix_stream_data_wait() unix_stream_data_wait() does skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue) without holding any lock that prevents SKBs on that queue from being dequeued and freed. This has been the case since commit 79f632c71bea ("unix/stream: fix peeking with an offset larger than data in queue"). The first consequence of this is that the pointer comparison tail != last can be false even if last semantically refers to an already-freed SKB while tail is a new SKB allocated at the same address; which can cause unix_stream_data_wait() to wrongly keep blocking after new data has arrived, but only in a weird scenario where a peeking recv() and a normal recv() on the same socket are racing, which is probably not a real problem. But since commit 2b514574f7e8 ("net: af_unix: implement splice for stream af_unix sockets"), tail is actually dereferenced, which can cause UAF in the following race scenario (where test_setup() runs single-threaded, and afterwards, test_thread1() and test_thread2() run concurrently in two threads:

static int socks[2]; void test_setup(void) { socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, socks); send(socks[1], "A", 1, 0); int peekoff = 1; setsockopt(socks[0], SOL_SOCKET, SO_PEEK_OFF, &peekoff, sizeof(peekoff)); } void test_thread1(void) { char dummy; recv(socks[0], &dummy, 1, MSG_PEEK); } void test_thread2(void) { char dummy; recv(socks[0], &dummy, 1, 0); shutdown(socks[1], SHUT_WR); }

when racing like this:

thread1 thread2 unix_stream_read_generic mutex_lock(&u->iolock) skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue) skb_peek_next(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue) mutex_unlock(&u->iolock) unix_stream_read_generic unix_state_lock(sk) skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue) unix_state_unlock(sk) unix_stream_data_wait unix_state_lock(sk) tail = skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue) spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock) __skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue) spin_unlock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock) consume_skb(skb) [frees the SKB] `tail != last`: false `tail`: true `tail->len != last_len` ***UAF***

Fix the UAF by removing the read of tail->len; checking tail->len would only make sense if SKBs in the receive queue of a UNIX socket could grow, which can no longer happen. Kuniyuki explained:

When commit 869e7c62486e ("net: af_unix: implement stream sendpage support") added sendpage() support, data could be appended to the last skb in the receiver's queue.

That's why we needed to check if the length of the last skb was changed while waiting for new data in unix_stream_data_wait().

However, commit a0dbf5f818f9 ("af_unix: Support MSG_SPLICE_PAGES") and commit 57d44a354a43 ("unix: Convert unix_stream_sendpage() to use MSG_SPLICE_PAGES") refactored sendmsg(), and now data is always added to a new skb. That means this fix is not suitable for kernels before 6.5.

A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's af_unix (UNIX domain sockets) component. A race condition in the unix_stream_data_wait() function allows a local attacker to trigger a Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability. This occurs because the function peeks at a socket buffer without proper locking, enabling another thread to free the buffer while it is still being referenced. Successful exploitation of this UAF could lead to system instability or potentially information disclosure.

Отчет

Use-after-free read in the AF_UNIX stream receive path can occur because unix_stream_data_wait reads the length of the tail SKB after observing the receive queue without a lock that protects against dequeue and free. A local process can trigger the race by using AF_UNIX stream sockets with peeking and normal receive operations on the same socket so that one thread waits on stale queue state while another thread removes and frees the SKB. For the CVSS the PR:L because attacker controlled local code is needed to create the socket state and race the recv operations, but no administrative privilege is required. The issue is not network reachable because AF_UNIX sockets are local IPC. Impact is at least local denial of service via kernel warning or crash, and in the paranoid score limited confidentiality or integrity impact is kept possible because this is a real UAF read of a freed kernel object, not just a pure logic hang.

Меры по смягчению последствий

Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.

Затронутые пакеты

ПлатформаПакетСостояниеРекомендацияРелиз
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6kernelOut of support scope
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7kernelAffected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7kernel-rtAffected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9kernelAffected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9kernel-rtAffected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10kernelFixedRHSA-2026:9156528.10.2026
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8kernel-rtFixedRHSA-2026:9343702.11.2026
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8kernelFixedRHSA-2026:9343602.11.2026
Shadow Migration Toolkit for Virtualization for RHEL 10kernelFixedRHSA-2026:9156528.10.2026

Показывать по

Дополнительная информация

Статус:

Moderate
Дефект:
CWE-416
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2502615kernel: af_unix: Fix UAF read of tail->len in unix_stream_data_wait()

4.7 Medium

CVSS3

Связанные уязвимости

CVSS3: 8.8
ubuntu
4 месяца назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Fix UAF read of tail->len in unix_stream_data_wait() unix_stream_data_wait() does skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue) without holding any lock that prevents SKBs on that queue from being dequeued and freed. This has been the case since commit 79f632c71bea ("unix/stream: fix peeking with an offset larger than data in queue"). The first consequence of this is that the pointer comparison `tail != last` can be false even if `last` semantically refers to an already-freed SKB while `tail` is a new SKB allocated at the same address; which can cause unix_stream_data_wait() to wrongly keep blocking after new data has arrived, but only in a weird scenario where a peeking recv() and a normal recv() on the same socket are racing, which is probably not a real problem. But since commit 2b514574f7e8 ("net: af_unix: implement splice for stream af_unix sockets"), `tail` is actually dereferenced, which can cause UAF in the ...

CVSS3: 8.8
nvd
4 месяца назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Fix UAF read of tail->len in unix_stream_data_wait() unix_stream_data_wait() does skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue) without holding any lock that prevents SKBs on that queue from being dequeued and freed. This has been the case since commit 79f632c71bea ("unix/stream: fix peeking with an offset larger than data in queue"). The first consequence of this is that the pointer comparison `tail != last` can be false even if `last` semantically refers to an already-freed SKB while `tail` is a new SKB allocated at the same address; which can cause unix_stream_data_wait() to wrongly keep blocking after new data has arrived, but only in a weird scenario where a peeking recv() and a normal recv() on the same socket are racing, which is probably not a real problem. But since commit 2b514574f7e8 ("net: af_unix: implement splice for stream af_unix sockets"), `tail` is actually dereferenced, which can cause UAF in the

CVSS3: 8.8
debian
4 месяца назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: a ...

CVSS3: 8.8
github
4 месяца назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Fix UAF read of tail->len in unix_stream_data_wait() unix_stream_data_wait() does skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue) without holding any lock that prevents SKBs on that queue from being dequeued and freed. This has been the case since commit 79f632c71bea ("unix/stream: fix peeking with an offset larger than data in queue"). The first consequence of this is that the pointer comparison `tail != last` can be false even if `last` semantically refers to an already-freed SKB while `tail` is a new SKB allocated at the same address; which can cause unix_stream_data_wait() to wrongly keep blocking after new data has arrived, but only in a weird scenario where a peeking recv() and a normal recv() on the same socket are racing, which is probably not a real problem. But since commit 2b514574f7e8 ("net: af_unix: implement splice for stream af_unix sockets"), `tail` is actually dereferenced, which can cause UAF in t...

oracle-oval
7 дней назад

ELSA-2026-93436: kernel security update (IMPORTANT)

4.7 Medium

CVSS3