Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

ubuntu логотип

CVE-2017-3737

Опубликовано: 07 дек. 2017
Источник: ubuntu
Приоритет: medium
EPSS Средний
CVSS2: 4.3
CVSS3: 5.9

Описание

OpenSSL 1.0.2 (starting from version 1.0.2b) introduced an "error state" mechanism. The intent was that if a fatal error occurred during a handshake then OpenSSL would move into the error state and would immediately fail if you attempted to continue the handshake. This works as designed for the explicit handshake functions (SSL_do_handshake(), SSL_accept() and SSL_connect()), however due to a bug it does not work correctly if SSL_read() or SSL_write() is called directly. In that scenario, if the handshake fails then a fatal error will be returned in the initial function call. If SSL_read()/SSL_write() is subsequently called by the application for the same SSL object then it will succeed and the data is passed without being decrypted/encrypted directly from the SSL/TLS record layer. In order to exploit this issue an application bug would have to be present that resulted in a call to SSL_read()/SSL_write() being issued after having already received a fatal error. OpenSSL version 1.0.2...

РелизСтатусПримечание
artful

released

1.0.2g-1ubuntu13.3
devel

released

1.0.2n-1ubuntu1
esm-infra-legacy/trusty

not-affected

code not present
esm-infra/xenial

not-affected

1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.10
precise/esm

not-affected

code not present
trusty

not-affected

code not present
trusty/esm

not-affected

code not present
upstream

needs-triage

xenial

released

1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.10
zesty

released

1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.4

Показывать по

EPSS

Процентиль: 97%
0.32186
Средний

4.3 Medium

CVSS2

5.9 Medium

CVSS3

Связанные уязвимости

CVSS3: 5.9
redhat
больше 7 лет назад

OpenSSL 1.0.2 (starting from version 1.0.2b) introduced an "error state" mechanism. The intent was that if a fatal error occurred during a handshake then OpenSSL would move into the error state and would immediately fail if you attempted to continue the handshake. This works as designed for the explicit handshake functions (SSL_do_handshake(), SSL_accept() and SSL_connect()), however due to a bug it does not work correctly if SSL_read() or SSL_write() is called directly. In that scenario, if the handshake fails then a fatal error will be returned in the initial function call. If SSL_read()/SSL_write() is subsequently called by the application for the same SSL object then it will succeed and the data is passed without being decrypted/encrypted directly from the SSL/TLS record layer. In order to exploit this issue an application bug would have to be present that resulted in a call to SSL_read()/SSL_write() being issued after having already received a fatal error. OpenSSL version 1.0.2...

CVSS3: 5.9
nvd
больше 7 лет назад

OpenSSL 1.0.2 (starting from version 1.0.2b) introduced an "error state" mechanism. The intent was that if a fatal error occurred during a handshake then OpenSSL would move into the error state and would immediately fail if you attempted to continue the handshake. This works as designed for the explicit handshake functions (SSL_do_handshake(), SSL_accept() and SSL_connect()), however due to a bug it does not work correctly if SSL_read() or SSL_write() is called directly. In that scenario, if the handshake fails then a fatal error will be returned in the initial function call. If SSL_read()/SSL_write() is subsequently called by the application for the same SSL object then it will succeed and the data is passed without being decrypted/encrypted directly from the SSL/TLS record layer. In order to exploit this issue an application bug would have to be present that resulted in a call to SSL_read()/SSL_write() being issued after having already received a fatal error. OpenSSL version 1.0.2b-1

CVSS3: 5.9
debian
больше 7 лет назад

OpenSSL 1.0.2 (starting from version 1.0.2b) introduced an "error stat ...

CVSS3: 5.9
github
около 3 лет назад

OpenSSL 1.0.2 (starting from version 1.0.2b) introduced an "error state" mechanism. The intent was that if a fatal error occurred during a handshake then OpenSSL would move into the error state and would immediately fail if you attempted to continue the handshake. This works as designed for the explicit handshake functions (SSL_do_handshake(), SSL_accept() and SSL_connect()), however due to a bug it does not work correctly if SSL_read() or SSL_write() is called directly. In that scenario, if the handshake fails then a fatal error will be returned in the initial function call. If SSL_read()/SSL_write() is subsequently called by the application for the same SSL object then it will succeed and the data is passed without being decrypted/encrypted directly from the SSL/TLS record layer. In order to exploit this issue an application bug would have to be present that resulted in a call to SSL_read()/SSL_write() being issued after having already received a fatal error. OpenSSL version 1.0.2...

CVSS3: 5.9
fstec
почти 7 лет назад

Уязвимость программного обеспечения криптографической библиотеки OpenSSL, связанная с некорректной работой механизма «error state», позволяющая нарушителю передавать незашифрованные конфиденциальные данные по сети

EPSS

Процентиль: 97%
0.32186
Средний

4.3 Medium

CVSS2

5.9 Medium

CVSS3