Описание
This issue can affect BIND 9 resolvers with stale-answer-enable yes; that also make use of the option stale-answer-client-timeout, configured with a value greater than zero. If the resolver receives many queries that require recursion, there will be a corresponding increase in the number of clients that are waiting for recursion to complete. If there are sufficient clients already waiting when a new client query is received so that it is necessary to SERVFAIL the longest waiting client (see BIND 9 ARM recursive-clients limit and soft quota), then it is possible for a race to occur between providing a stale answer to this older client and sending an early timeout SERVFAIL, which may cause an assertion failure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.12 through 9.16.36, 9.18.0 through 9.18.10, 9.19.0 through 9.19.8, and 9.16.12-S1 through 9.16.36-S1.
| Релиз | Статус | Примечание |
|---|---|---|
| bionic | not-affected | 1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.18 |
| devel | released | 1:9.18.11-2ubuntu1 |
| esm-infra-legacy/trusty | not-affected | |
| esm-infra/bionic | not-affected | 1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.18 |
| esm-infra/focal | not-affected | 1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.11 |
| esm-infra/xenial | not-affected | |
| focal | not-affected | 1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.11 |
| jammy | released | 1:9.18.1-1ubuntu1.3 |
| kinetic | released | 1:9.18.4-2ubuntu2.1 |
| lunar | released | 1:9.18.11-2ubuntu1 |
Показывать по
| Релиз | Статус | Примечание |
|---|---|---|
| bionic | not-affected | code not present |
| devel | not-affected | code not present |
| esm-infra-legacy/trusty | not-affected | code not present |
| esm-infra/bionic | not-affected | code not present |
| esm-infra/focal | not-affected | code not present |
| esm-infra/xenial | not-affected | code not present |
| focal | not-affected | code not present |
| jammy | not-affected | code not present |
| kinetic | not-affected | code not present |
| lunar | not-affected | code not present |
Показывать по
EPSS
7.5 High
CVSS3
Связанные уязвимости
This issue can affect BIND 9 resolvers with `stale-answer-enable yes;` that also make use of the option `stale-answer-client-timeout`, configured with a value greater than zero. If the resolver receives many queries that require recursion, there will be a corresponding increase in the number of clients that are waiting for recursion to complete. If there are sufficient clients already waiting when a new client query is received so that it is necessary to SERVFAIL the longest waiting client (see BIND 9 ARM `recursive-clients` limit and soft quota), then it is possible for a race to occur between providing a stale answer to this older client and sending an early timeout SERVFAIL, which may cause an assertion failure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.12 through 9.16.36, 9.18.0 through 9.18.10, 9.19.0 through 9.19.8, and 9.16.12-S1 through 9.16.36-S1.
This issue can affect BIND 9 resolvers with `stale-answer-enable yes;` that also make use of the option `stale-answer-client-timeout`, configured with a value greater than zero. If the resolver receives many queries that require recursion, there will be a corresponding increase in the number of clients that are waiting for recursion to complete. If there are sufficient clients already waiting when a new client query is received so that it is necessary to SERVFAIL the longest waiting client (see BIND 9 ARM `recursive-clients` limit and soft quota), then it is possible for a race to occur between providing a stale answer to this older client and sending an early timeout SERVFAIL, which may cause an assertion failure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.12 through 9.16.36, 9.18.0 through 9.18.10, 9.19.0 through 9.19.8, and 9.16.12-S1 through 9.16.36-S1.
This issue can affect BIND 9 resolvers with `stale-answer-enable yes;` ...
This issue can affect BIND 9 resolvers with `stale-answer-enable yes;` that also make use of the option `stale-answer-client-timeout`, configured with a value greater than zero. If the resolver receives many queries that require recursion, there will be a corresponding increase in the number of clients that are waiting for recursion to complete. If there are sufficient clients already waiting when a new client query is received so that it is necessary to SERVFAIL the longest waiting client (see BIND 9 ARM `recursive-clients` limit and soft quota), then it is possible for a race to occur between providing a stale answer to this older client and sending an early timeout SERVFAIL, which may cause an assertion failure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.12 through 9.16.36, 9.18.0 through 9.18.10, 9.19.0 through 9.19.8, and 9.16.12-S1 through 9.16.36-S1.
Уязвимость сервера DNS BIND, связанная с недостатком использования функции assert(), позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
EPSS
7.5 High
CVSS3