Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

ubuntu логотип

CVE-2024-56170

Опубликовано: 18 дек. 2024
Источник: ubuntu
Приоритет: medium
EPSS Низкий
CVSS3: 5.3

Описание

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent replays, accidental or otherwise. Manifests contain the manifestNumber and thisUpdate fields, which can be used to gauge the relevance of a given manifest, when compared to other manifests. The former is a serial-like sequential number, and the latter is the date on which the manifest was created. However, the product does not compare the up-to-dateness of the most recently fetched manifest against the cached manifest. As such, it's prone to a rollback to a previous version if it's served a valid outdated manifest. This leads to outdated route origin validation.

РелизСтатусПримечание
devel

deferred

2025-09-29
esm-apps/focal

deferred

2025-09-29
esm-apps/jammy

deferred

2025-09-29
esm-apps/noble

deferred

2025-09-29
focal

ignored

end of standard support, was needs-triage
jammy

deferred

2025-09-29
noble

deferred

2025-09-29
oracular

ignored

end of life, was needs-triage
plucky

ignored

end of life, was deferred [2025-09-29]
questing

deferred

2025-09-29

Показывать по

EPSS

Процентиль: 58%
0.00367
Низкий

5.3 Medium

CVSS3

Связанные уязвимости

CVSS3: 5.3
nvd
около 1 года назад

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent replays, accidental or otherwise. Manifests contain the manifestNumber and thisUpdate fields, which can be used to gauge the relevance of a given manifest, when compared to other manifests. The former is a serial-like sequential number, and the latter is the date on which the manifest was created. However, the product does not compare the up-to-dateness of the most recently fetched manifest against the cached manifest. As such, it's prone to a rollback to a previous version if it's served a valid outdated manifest. This leads to outdated route origin validation.

CVSS3: 5.3
debian
около 1 года назад

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 befo ...

CVSS3: 5.3
github
около 1 года назад

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent replays, accidental or otherwise. Manifests contain the manifestNumber and thisUpdate fields, which can be used to gauge the relevance of a given manifest, when compared to other manifests. The former is a serial-like sequential number, and the latter is the date on which the manifest was created. However, the product does not compare the up-to-dateness of the most recently fetched manifest against the cached manifest. As such, it's prone to a rollback to a previous version if it's served a valid outdated manifest. This leads to outdated route origin validation.

EPSS

Процентиль: 58%
0.00367
Низкий

5.3 Medium

CVSS3