Описание
Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises. Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity validation for a given message. In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the message. An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK (the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB (Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and with...
| Релиз | Статус | Примечание |
|---|---|---|
| devel | needs-triage | |
| esm-apps-legacy/xenial | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
| esm-apps/bionic | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
| esm-infra/focal | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
| jammy | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
| noble | needs-triage | |
| questing | ignored | end of life, was needs-triage |
| resolute | needs-triage | |
| upstream | needs-triage |
Показывать по
| Релиз | Статус | Примечание |
|---|---|---|
| devel | not-affected | uses system openssl |
| esm-apps-legacy/xenial | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
| esm-apps/bionic | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
| esm-apps/focal | not-affected | uses system openssl |
| esm-apps/jammy | needed | |
| esm-apps/noble | not-affected | uses system openssl |
| esm-apps/resolute | not-affected | uses system openssl |
| esm-infra-legacy/trusty | not-affected | uses system openssl |
| jammy | needed | |
| noble | not-affected | uses system openssl |
Показывать по
| Релиз | Статус | Примечание |
|---|---|---|
| devel | pending | 3.5.5-1ubuntu4 |
| esm-infra-legacy/trusty | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
| esm-infra-legacy/xenial | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
| esm-infra/bionic | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
| esm-infra/focal | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
| fips-preview/jammy | needed | |
| fips-updates/bionic | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
| fips-updates/focal | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
| fips-updates/jammy | released | 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.25+Fips1 |
| fips-updates/xenial | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
Показывать по
| Релиз | Статус | Примечание |
|---|---|---|
| devel | DNE | |
| fips-preview/jammy | needs-triage | |
| fips-updates/jammy | needs-triage | |
| fips-updates/noble | needs-triage | |
| jammy | DNE | |
| noble | DNE | |
| questing | DNE | |
| resolute | DNE | |
| upstream | needs-triage |
Показывать по
| Релиз | Статус | Примечание |
|---|---|---|
| devel | DNE | |
| esm-infra/bionic | not-affected | 3.0+ only |
| jammy | DNE | |
| noble | DNE | |
| questing | DNE | |
| resolute | DNE | |
| upstream | needs-triage |
Показывать по
EPSS
9.1 Critical
CVSS3
Связанные уязвимости
Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises. Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity validation for a given message. In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the message. An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK (the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB (Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and with...
Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises. Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity validation for a given message. In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the message. An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK (the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB (Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and with
CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages
Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails t ...
Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises. Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity validation for a given message. In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the message. An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK (the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB (Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and w...
EPSS
9.1 Critical
CVSS3