Django — свободный фреймворк для веб-приложений на языке Python, использующий шаблон проектирования MVC
Релизный цикл, информация об уязвимостях
График релизов
Количество 751
CVE-2017-12794
In Django 1.10.x before 1.10.8 and 1.11.x before 1.11.5, HTML autoescaping was disabled in a portion of the template for the technical 500 debug page. Given the right circumstances, this allowed a cross-site scripting attack. This vulnerability shouldn't affect most production sites since you shouldn't run with "DEBUG = True" (which makes this page accessible) in your production settings.
BDU:2019-04056
Уязвимость функции авто-экранирования HTML библиотеки Django для языка программирования Python, позволяющая нарушителю осуществлять межсайтовые сценарные атаки
CVE-2017-7234
A maliciously crafted URL to a Django (1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18) site using the ``django.views.static.serve()`` view could redirect to any other domain, aka an open redirect vulnerability.
CVE-2017-7234
A maliciously crafted URL to a Django (1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before ...
CVE-2017-7233
Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack.
CVE-2017-7233
Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 re ...
CVE-2017-7234
A maliciously crafted URL to a Django (1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18) site using the ``django.views.static.serve()`` view could redirect to any other domain, aka an open redirect vulnerability.
CVE-2017-7233
Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack.
CVE-2017-7233
Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack.
CVE-2017-7234
A maliciously crafted URL to a Django (1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18) site using the ``django.views.static.serve()`` view could redirect to any other domain, aka an open redirect vulnerability.
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2017-12794 In Django 1.10.x before 1.10.8 and 1.11.x before 1.11.5, HTML autoescaping was disabled in a portion of the template for the technical 500 debug page. Given the right circumstances, this allowed a cross-site scripting attack. This vulnerability shouldn't affect most production sites since you shouldn't run with "DEBUG = True" (which makes this page accessible) in your production settings. | CVSS3: 4 | 17% Средний | больше 8 лет назад | |
BDU:2019-04056 Уязвимость функции авто-экранирования HTML библиотеки Django для языка программирования Python, позволяющая нарушителю осуществлять межсайтовые сценарные атаки | CVSS3: 6.1 | 17% Средний | больше 8 лет назад | |
CVE-2017-7234 A maliciously crafted URL to a Django (1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18) site using the ``django.views.static.serve()`` view could redirect to any other domain, aka an open redirect vulnerability. | CVSS3: 6.1 | 0% Низкий | почти 9 лет назад | |
CVE-2017-7234 A maliciously crafted URL to a Django (1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before ... | CVSS3: 6.1 | 0% Низкий | почти 9 лет назад | |
CVE-2017-7233 Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack. | CVSS3: 6.1 | 1% Низкий | почти 9 лет назад | |
CVE-2017-7233 Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 re ... | CVSS3: 6.1 | 1% Низкий | почти 9 лет назад | |
CVE-2017-7234 A maliciously crafted URL to a Django (1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18) site using the ``django.views.static.serve()`` view could redirect to any other domain, aka an open redirect vulnerability. | CVSS3: 6.1 | 0% Низкий | почти 9 лет назад | |
CVE-2017-7233 Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack. | CVSS3: 6.1 | 1% Низкий | почти 9 лет назад | |
CVE-2017-7233 Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack. | CVSS3: 6.1 | 1% Низкий | почти 9 лет назад | |
CVE-2017-7234 A maliciously crafted URL to a Django (1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18) site using the ``django.views.static.serve()`` view could redirect to any other domain, aka an open redirect vulnerability. | CVSS3: 4.7 | 0% Низкий | почти 9 лет назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу