Логотип exploitDog
product: "node.js"
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

product: "node.js"
Node.js

Node.jsпрограммная платформа, основанная на движке V8 (компилирующем JavaScript в машинный код)

Релизный цикл, информация об уязвимостях

Продукт: Node.js
Вендор: nodejs

График релизов

2021222324252023202420252026202720282029

Недавние уязвимости Node.js

Количество 1 025

suse-cvrf логотип

SUSE-SU-2020:3740-1

почти 5 лет назад

Security update for openssl-1_1

EPSS: Низкий
suse-cvrf логотип

SUSE-SU-2020:14560-1

почти 5 лет назад

Security update for openssl1

EPSS: Низкий
suse-cvrf логотип

SUSE-SU-2020:3732-1

почти 5 лет назад

Security update for openssl-1_0_0

EPSS: Низкий
suse-cvrf логотип

SUSE-SU-2020:3722-1

почти 5 лет назад

Security update for openssl-1_1

EPSS: Низкий
suse-cvrf логотип

SUSE-SU-2020:3721-1

почти 5 лет назад

Security update for openssl-1_1

EPSS: Низкий
suse-cvrf логотип

SUSE-SU-2020:3720-1

почти 5 лет назад

Security update for openssl-1_1

EPSS: Низкий
nvd логотип

CVE-2020-1971

почти 5 лет назад

The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious ce

CVSS3: 5.9
EPSS: Низкий
debian логотип

CVE-2020-1971

почти 5 лет назад

The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing differen ...

CVSS3: 5.9
EPSS: Низкий
ubuntu логотип

CVE-2020-1971

почти 5 лет назад

The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious...

CVSS3: 5.9
EPSS: Низкий
redhat логотип

CVE-2020-1971

почти 5 лет назад

The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious...

CVSS3: 5.9
EPSS: Низкий

Уязвимостей на страницу

Уязвимость
CVSS
EPSS
Опубликовано
1
suse-cvrf логотип
SUSE-SU-2020:3740-1

Security update for openssl-1_1

0%
Низкий
почти 5 лет назад
suse-cvrf логотип
SUSE-SU-2020:14560-1

Security update for openssl1

0%
Низкий
почти 5 лет назад
suse-cvrf логотип
SUSE-SU-2020:3732-1

Security update for openssl-1_0_0

0%
Низкий
почти 5 лет назад
suse-cvrf логотип
SUSE-SU-2020:3722-1

Security update for openssl-1_1

0%
Низкий
почти 5 лет назад
suse-cvrf логотип
SUSE-SU-2020:3721-1

Security update for openssl-1_1

0%
Низкий
почти 5 лет назад
suse-cvrf логотип
SUSE-SU-2020:3720-1

Security update for openssl-1_1

0%
Низкий
почти 5 лет назад
nvd логотип
CVE-2020-1971

The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious ce

CVSS3: 5.9
0%
Низкий
почти 5 лет назад
debian логотип
CVE-2020-1971

The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing differen ...

CVSS3: 5.9
0%
Низкий
почти 5 лет назад
ubuntu логотип
CVE-2020-1971

The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious...

CVSS3: 5.9
0%
Низкий
почти 5 лет назад
redhat логотип
CVE-2020-1971

The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious...

CVSS3: 5.9
0%
Низкий
почти 5 лет назад

Уязвимостей на страницу


Поделиться