Node.js — программная платформа, основанная на движке V8 (компилирующем JavaScript в машинный код)
Релизный цикл, информация об уязвимостях
График релизов
Релизные элементы
| KB | Версия | Билд | Дата доступности |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24.18.1 | 24.18.1 | ||
| 24.18.0 | 24.18.0 | ||
| 24.17.0 | 24.17.0 | ||
| 24.16.0 | 24.16.0 | ||
| 24.15.0 | 24.15.0 | ||
| 24.14.1 | 24.14.1 | ||
| 24.14.0 | 24.14.0 | ||
| 24.13.1 | 24.13.1 | ||
| 24.13.0 | 24.13.0 | ||
| 24.12.0 | 24.12.0 |
Показывать по
Количество 1 203
CVE-2019-9513
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU.
CVE-2019-9513
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentia ...
CVE-2019-9512
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
CVE-2019-9512
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially ...
CVE-2019-9511
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
CVE-2019-9511
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation ...
CVE-2019-9515
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
CVE-2019-9511
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
CVE-2019-9516
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory.
CVE-2019-9514
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2019-9513 Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. | CVSS3: 7.5 | 82% Высокий | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-9513 Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentia ... | CVSS3: 7.5 | 82% Высокий | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-9512 Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | CVSS3: 7.5 | 83% Высокий | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-9512 Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially ... | CVSS3: 7.5 | 83% Высокий | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-9511 Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | CVSS3: 7.5 | 60% Средний | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-9511 Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation ... | CVSS3: 7.5 | 60% Средний | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-9515 Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | CVSS3: 7.5 | 87% Высокий | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-9511 Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | CVSS3: 7.5 | 60% Средний | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-9516 Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. | CVSS3: 6.5 | 56% Средний | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-9514 Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | CVSS3: 7.5 | 83% Высокий | почти 7 лет назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу