Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

Количество 8

Количество 8

fstec логотип

BDU:2025-11804

больше 1 года назад

Уязвимость компонента kernel/seccomp.c ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
ubuntu логотип

CVE-2025-21834

больше 1 года назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering When attaching uretprobes to processes running inside docker, the attached process is segfaulted when encountering the retprobe. The reason is that now that uretprobe is a system call the default seccomp filters in docker block it as they only allow a specific set of known syscalls. This is true for other userspace applications which use seccomp to control their syscall surface. Since uretprobe is a "kernel implementation detail" system call which is not used by userspace application code directly, it is impractical and there's very little point in forcing all userspace applications to explicitly allow it in order to avoid crashing tracked processes. Pass this systemcall through seccomp without depending on configuration. Note: uretprobe is currently only x86_64 and isn't expected to ever be supported in i386. [kees: minimized changes for easier backporting...

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
redhat логотип

CVE-2025-21834

больше 1 года назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering When attaching uretprobes to processes running inside docker, the attached process is segfaulted when encountering the retprobe. The reason is that now that uretprobe is a system call the default seccomp filters in docker block it as they only allow a specific set of known syscalls. This is true for other userspace applications which use seccomp to control their syscall surface. Since uretprobe is a "kernel implementation detail" system call which is not used by userspace application code directly, it is impractical and there's very little point in forcing all userspace applications to explicitly allow it in order to avoid crashing tracked processes. Pass this systemcall through seccomp without depending on configuration. Note: uretprobe is currently only x86_64 and isn't expected to ever be supported in i386. [kees: minimized changes for easier backporting...

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
nvd логотип

CVE-2025-21834

больше 1 года назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering When attaching uretprobes to processes running inside docker, the attached process is segfaulted when encountering the retprobe. The reason is that now that uretprobe is a system call the default seccomp filters in docker block it as they only allow a specific set of known syscalls. This is true for other userspace applications which use seccomp to control their syscall surface. Since uretprobe is a "kernel implementation detail" system call which is not used by userspace application code directly, it is impractical and there's very little point in forcing all userspace applications to explicitly allow it in order to avoid crashing tracked processes. Pass this systemcall through seccomp without depending on configuration. Note: uretprobe is currently only x86_64 and isn't expected to ever be supported in i386. [kees: minimized changes for easier backpor

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
debian логотип

CVE-2025-21834

больше 1 года назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s ...

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
github логотип

GHSA-3cmq-72j9-674j

больше 1 года назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering When attaching uretprobes to processes running inside docker, the attached process is segfaulted when encountering the retprobe. The reason is that now that uretprobe is a system call the default seccomp filters in docker block it as they only allow a specific set of known syscalls. This is true for other userspace applications which use seccomp to control their syscall surface. Since uretprobe is a "kernel implementation detail" system call which is not used by userspace application code directly, it is impractical and there's very little point in forcing all userspace applications to explicitly allow it in order to avoid crashing tracked processes. Pass this systemcall through seccomp without depending on configuration. Note: uretprobe is currently only x86_64 and isn't expected to ever be supported in i386. [kees: minimized changes for easier back...

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
oracle-oval логотип

ELSA-2025-20530

12 месяцев назад

ELSA-2025-20530: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)

EPSS: Низкий
oracle-oval логотип

ELSA-2025-20480

около 1 года назад

ELSA-2025-20480: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)

EPSS: Низкий

Уязвимостей на страницу

Уязвимость
CVSS
EPSS
Опубликовано
fstec логотип
BDU:2025-11804

Уязвимость компонента kernel/seccomp.c ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
больше 1 года назад
ubuntu логотип
CVE-2025-21834

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering When attaching uretprobes to processes running inside docker, the attached process is segfaulted when encountering the retprobe. The reason is that now that uretprobe is a system call the default seccomp filters in docker block it as they only allow a specific set of known syscalls. This is true for other userspace applications which use seccomp to control their syscall surface. Since uretprobe is a "kernel implementation detail" system call which is not used by userspace application code directly, it is impractical and there's very little point in forcing all userspace applications to explicitly allow it in order to avoid crashing tracked processes. Pass this systemcall through seccomp without depending on configuration. Note: uretprobe is currently only x86_64 and isn't expected to ever be supported in i386. [kees: minimized changes for easier backporting...

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
больше 1 года назад
redhat логотип
CVE-2025-21834

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering When attaching uretprobes to processes running inside docker, the attached process is segfaulted when encountering the retprobe. The reason is that now that uretprobe is a system call the default seccomp filters in docker block it as they only allow a specific set of known syscalls. This is true for other userspace applications which use seccomp to control their syscall surface. Since uretprobe is a "kernel implementation detail" system call which is not used by userspace application code directly, it is impractical and there's very little point in forcing all userspace applications to explicitly allow it in order to avoid crashing tracked processes. Pass this systemcall through seccomp without depending on configuration. Note: uretprobe is currently only x86_64 and isn't expected to ever be supported in i386. [kees: minimized changes for easier backporting...

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
больше 1 года назад
nvd логотип
CVE-2025-21834

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering When attaching uretprobes to processes running inside docker, the attached process is segfaulted when encountering the retprobe. The reason is that now that uretprobe is a system call the default seccomp filters in docker block it as they only allow a specific set of known syscalls. This is true for other userspace applications which use seccomp to control their syscall surface. Since uretprobe is a "kernel implementation detail" system call which is not used by userspace application code directly, it is impractical and there's very little point in forcing all userspace applications to explicitly allow it in order to avoid crashing tracked processes. Pass this systemcall through seccomp without depending on configuration. Note: uretprobe is currently only x86_64 and isn't expected to ever be supported in i386. [kees: minimized changes for easier backpor

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
больше 1 года назад
debian логотип
CVE-2025-21834

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s ...

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
больше 1 года назад
github логотип
GHSA-3cmq-72j9-674j

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering When attaching uretprobes to processes running inside docker, the attached process is segfaulted when encountering the retprobe. The reason is that now that uretprobe is a system call the default seccomp filters in docker block it as they only allow a specific set of known syscalls. This is true for other userspace applications which use seccomp to control their syscall surface. Since uretprobe is a "kernel implementation detail" system call which is not used by userspace application code directly, it is impractical and there's very little point in forcing all userspace applications to explicitly allow it in order to avoid crashing tracked processes. Pass this systemcall through seccomp without depending on configuration. Note: uretprobe is currently only x86_64 and isn't expected to ever be supported in i386. [kees: minimized changes for easier back...

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
больше 1 года назад
oracle-oval логотип
ELSA-2025-20530

ELSA-2025-20530: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)

12 месяцев назад
oracle-oval логотип
ELSA-2025-20480

ELSA-2025-20480: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)

около 1 года назад

Уязвимостей на страницу