Логотип exploitDog
bind:"BDU:2026-00888" OR bind:"CVE-2025-68778"
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

bind:"BDU:2026-00888" OR bind:"CVE-2025-68778"

Количество 9

Количество 9

fstec логотип

BDU:2026-00888

4 месяца назад

Уязвимость функции btrfs_log_new_name() ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
ubuntu логотип

CVE-2025-68778

2 месяца назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't log conflicting inode if it's a dir moved in the current transaction We can't log a conflicting inode if it's a directory and it was moved from one parent directory to another parent directory in the current transaction, as this can result an attempt to have a directory with two hard links during log replay, one for the old parent directory and another for the new parent directory. The following scenario triggers that issue: 1) We have directories "dir1" and "dir2" created in a past transaction. Directory "dir1" has inode A as its parent directory; 2) We move "dir1" to some other directory; 3) We create a file with the name "dir1" in directory inode A; 4) We fsync the new file. This results in logging the inode of the new file and the inode for the directory "dir1" that was previously moved in the current transaction. So the log tree has the INODE_REF item for the new location of "dir1"; 5) We move the ...

EPSS: Низкий
redhat логотип

CVE-2025-68778

2 месяца назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't log conflicting inode if it's a dir moved in the current transaction We can't log a conflicting inode if it's a directory and it was moved from one parent directory to another parent directory in the current transaction, as this can result an attempt to have a directory with two hard links during log replay, one for the old parent directory and another for the new parent directory. The following scenario triggers that issue: 1) We have directories "dir1" and "dir2" created in a past transaction. Directory "dir1" has inode A as its parent directory; 2) We move "dir1" to some other directory; 3) We create a file with the name "dir1" in directory inode A; 4) We fsync the new file. This results in logging the inode of the new file and the inode for the directory "dir1" that was previously moved in the current transaction. So the log tree has the INODE_REF item for the new location of "dir1"; 5) We move the ...

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
nvd логотип

CVE-2025-68778

2 месяца назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't log conflicting inode if it's a dir moved in the current transaction We can't log a conflicting inode if it's a directory and it was moved from one parent directory to another parent directory in the current transaction, as this can result an attempt to have a directory with two hard links during log replay, one for the old parent directory and another for the new parent directory. The following scenario triggers that issue: 1) We have directories "dir1" and "dir2" created in a past transaction. Directory "dir1" has inode A as its parent directory; 2) We move "dir1" to some other directory; 3) We create a file with the name "dir1" in directory inode A; 4) We fsync the new file. This results in logging the inode of the new file and the inode for the directory "dir1" that was previously moved in the current transaction. So the log tree has the INODE_REF item for the new location of "dir1";

EPSS: Низкий
msrc логотип

CVE-2025-68778

2 месяца назад

btrfs: don't log conflicting inode if it's a dir moved in the current transaction

CVSS3: 6.1
EPSS: Низкий
debian логотип

CVE-2025-68778

2 месяца назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: b ...

EPSS: Низкий
github логотип

GHSA-g468-fxhj-fm89

2 месяца назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't log conflicting inode if it's a dir moved in the current transaction We can't log a conflicting inode if it's a directory and it was moved from one parent directory to another parent directory in the current transaction, as this can result an attempt to have a directory with two hard links during log replay, one for the old parent directory and another for the new parent directory. The following scenario triggers that issue: 1) We have directories "dir1" and "dir2" created in a past transaction. Directory "dir1" has inode A as its parent directory; 2) We move "dir1" to some other directory; 3) We create a file with the name "dir1" in directory inode A; 4) We fsync the new file. This results in logging the inode of the new file and the inode for the directory "dir1" that was previously moved in the current transaction. So the log tree has the INODE_REF item for the new location of "dir...

EPSS: Низкий
oracle-oval логотип

ELSA-2026-50112

около 1 месяца назад

ELSA-2026-50112: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)

EPSS: Низкий
suse-cvrf логотип

openSUSE-SU-2026:20287-1

27 дней назад

Security update for the Linux Kernel

EPSS: Низкий

Уязвимостей на страницу

Уязвимость
CVSS
EPSS
Опубликовано
fstec логотип
BDU:2026-00888

Уязвимость функции btrfs_log_new_name() ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
4 месяца назад
ubuntu логотип
CVE-2025-68778

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't log conflicting inode if it's a dir moved in the current transaction We can't log a conflicting inode if it's a directory and it was moved from one parent directory to another parent directory in the current transaction, as this can result an attempt to have a directory with two hard links during log replay, one for the old parent directory and another for the new parent directory. The following scenario triggers that issue: 1) We have directories "dir1" and "dir2" created in a past transaction. Directory "dir1" has inode A as its parent directory; 2) We move "dir1" to some other directory; 3) We create a file with the name "dir1" in directory inode A; 4) We fsync the new file. This results in logging the inode of the new file and the inode for the directory "dir1" that was previously moved in the current transaction. So the log tree has the INODE_REF item for the new location of "dir1"; 5) We move the ...

0%
Низкий
2 месяца назад
redhat логотип
CVE-2025-68778

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't log conflicting inode if it's a dir moved in the current transaction We can't log a conflicting inode if it's a directory and it was moved from one parent directory to another parent directory in the current transaction, as this can result an attempt to have a directory with two hard links during log replay, one for the old parent directory and another for the new parent directory. The following scenario triggers that issue: 1) We have directories "dir1" and "dir2" created in a past transaction. Directory "dir1" has inode A as its parent directory; 2) We move "dir1" to some other directory; 3) We create a file with the name "dir1" in directory inode A; 4) We fsync the new file. This results in logging the inode of the new file and the inode for the directory "dir1" that was previously moved in the current transaction. So the log tree has the INODE_REF item for the new location of "dir1"; 5) We move the ...

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
2 месяца назад
nvd логотип
CVE-2025-68778

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't log conflicting inode if it's a dir moved in the current transaction We can't log a conflicting inode if it's a directory and it was moved from one parent directory to another parent directory in the current transaction, as this can result an attempt to have a directory with two hard links during log replay, one for the old parent directory and another for the new parent directory. The following scenario triggers that issue: 1) We have directories "dir1" and "dir2" created in a past transaction. Directory "dir1" has inode A as its parent directory; 2) We move "dir1" to some other directory; 3) We create a file with the name "dir1" in directory inode A; 4) We fsync the new file. This results in logging the inode of the new file and the inode for the directory "dir1" that was previously moved in the current transaction. So the log tree has the INODE_REF item for the new location of "dir1";

0%
Низкий
2 месяца назад
msrc логотип
CVE-2025-68778

btrfs: don't log conflicting inode if it's a dir moved in the current transaction

CVSS3: 6.1
0%
Низкий
2 месяца назад
debian логотип
CVE-2025-68778

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: b ...

0%
Низкий
2 месяца назад
github логотип
GHSA-g468-fxhj-fm89

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't log conflicting inode if it's a dir moved in the current transaction We can't log a conflicting inode if it's a directory and it was moved from one parent directory to another parent directory in the current transaction, as this can result an attempt to have a directory with two hard links during log replay, one for the old parent directory and another for the new parent directory. The following scenario triggers that issue: 1) We have directories "dir1" and "dir2" created in a past transaction. Directory "dir1" has inode A as its parent directory; 2) We move "dir1" to some other directory; 3) We create a file with the name "dir1" in directory inode A; 4) We fsync the new file. This results in logging the inode of the new file and the inode for the directory "dir1" that was previously moved in the current transaction. So the log tree has the INODE_REF item for the new location of "dir...

0%
Низкий
2 месяца назад
oracle-oval логотип
ELSA-2026-50112

ELSA-2026-50112: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)

около 1 месяца назад
suse-cvrf логотип
openSUSE-SU-2026:20287-1

Security update for the Linux Kernel

27 дней назад

Уязвимостей на страницу