Поиск уязвимостей
Количество 25
Количество 25
ALT-PU-2020-1708
ALT-PU-2020-1708: package `python3-module-django2.2` update to version 2.2.12-alt1
ALT-PU-2021-4975
ALT-PU-2021-4975: package `python-module-django` update to version 1.11.29-alt2
CVE-2019-19118
Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing. A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. (To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable.)
CVE-2019-19118
Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing. A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. (To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable.)
CVE-2019-19118
Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing. A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. (To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable.)
CVE-2019-19118
Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model ...
GHSA-hvmf-r92r-27hr
Django allows unintended model editing
CVE-2019-19844
Django before 1.11.27, 2.x before 2.2.9, and 3.x before 3.0.1 allows account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. (One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address.)
CVE-2019-19844
Django before 1.11.27, 2.x before 2.2.9, and 3.x before 3.0.1 allows account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. (One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address.)
CVE-2019-19844
Django before 1.11.27, 2.x before 2.2.9, and 3.x before 3.0.1 allows account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. (One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address.)
CVE-2019-19844
Django before 1.11.27, 2.x before 2.2.9, and 3.x before 3.0.1 allows a ...
GHSA-vfq6-hq5r-27r6
Django Potential account hijack via password reset form
BDU:2020-01459
Уязвимость фреймворка для веб-приложений Django, связанная с ошибкой в работе механизма восстановления паролей, позволяющая нарушителю оказать воздействие на целостность данных
CVE-2020-9402
Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL.
CVE-2020-9402
Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL.
CVE-2020-9402
Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL.
CVE-2020-9402
Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 al ...
CVE-2020-7471
Django 1.11 before 1.11.28, 2.2 before 2.2.10, and 3.0 before 3.0.3 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL.
CVE-2020-7471
Django 1.11 before 1.11.28, 2.2 before 2.2.10, and 3.0 before 3.0.3 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL.
CVE-2020-7471
Django 1.11 before 1.11.28, 2.2 before 2.2.10, and 3.0 before 3.0.3 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL.
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ALT-PU-2020-1708 ALT-PU-2020-1708: package `python3-module-django2.2` update to version 2.2.12-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | больше 6 лет назад | ||
ALT-PU-2021-4975 ALT-PU-2021-4975: package `python-module-django` update to version 1.11.29-alt2 | CVSS3: 9.8 | больше 5 лет назад | ||
CVE-2019-19118 Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing. A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. (To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable.) | CVSS3: 6.5 | 2% Низкий | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-19118 Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing. A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. (To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable.) | CVSS3: 6.5 | 2% Низкий | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-19118 Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing. A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. (To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable.) | CVSS3: 6.5 | 2% Низкий | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-19118 Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model ... | CVSS3: 6.5 | 2% Низкий | почти 7 лет назад | |
GHSA-hvmf-r92r-27hr Django allows unintended model editing | CVSS3: 6.5 | 2% Низкий | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-19844 Django before 1.11.27, 2.x before 2.2.9, and 3.x before 3.0.1 allows account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. (One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address.) | CVSS3: 9.8 | 54% Средний | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-19844 Django before 1.11.27, 2.x before 2.2.9, and 3.x before 3.0.1 allows account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. (One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address.) | CVSS3: 9.8 | 54% Средний | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-19844 Django before 1.11.27, 2.x before 2.2.9, and 3.x before 3.0.1 allows account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. (One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address.) | CVSS3: 9.8 | 54% Средний | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2019-19844 Django before 1.11.27, 2.x before 2.2.9, and 3.x before 3.0.1 allows a ... | CVSS3: 9.8 | 54% Средний | почти 7 лет назад | |
GHSA-vfq6-hq5r-27r6 Django Potential account hijack via password reset form | CVSS3: 9.8 | 54% Средний | почти 7 лет назад | |
BDU:2020-01459 Уязвимость фреймворка для веб-приложений Django, связанная с ошибкой в работе механизма восстановления паролей, позволяющая нарушителю оказать воздействие на целостность данных | CVSS3: 7.5 | 54% Средний | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2020-9402 Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. | CVSS3: 8.8 | 23% Средний | больше 6 лет назад | |
CVE-2020-9402 Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. | CVSS3: 8.8 | 23% Средний | больше 6 лет назад | |
CVE-2020-9402 Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. | CVSS3: 8.8 | 23% Средний | больше 6 лет назад | |
CVE-2020-9402 Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 al ... | CVSS3: 8.8 | 23% Средний | больше 6 лет назад | |
CVE-2020-7471 Django 1.11 before 1.11.28, 2.2 before 2.2.10, and 3.0 before 3.0.3 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. | CVSS3: 9.8 | 66% Средний | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2020-7471 Django 1.11 before 1.11.28, 2.2 before 2.2.10, and 3.0 before 3.0.3 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. | CVSS3: 9.8 | 66% Средний | почти 7 лет назад | |
CVE-2020-7471 Django 1.11 before 1.11.28, 2.2 before 2.2.10, and 3.0 before 3.0.3 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL. | CVSS3: 9.8 | 66% Средний | почти 7 лет назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу