Поиск уязвимостей
Количество 14
Количество 14
CVE-2021-47604
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vduse: check that offset is within bounds in get_config() This condition checks "len" but it does not check "offset" and that could result in an out of bounds read if "offset > dev->config_size". The problem is that since both variables are unsigned the "dev->config_size - offset" subtraction would result in a very high unsigned value. I think these checks might not be necessary because "len" and "offset" are supposed to already have been validated using the vhost_vdpa_config_validate() function. But I do not know the code perfectly, and I like to be safe.
CVE-2021-47604
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vduse: check that offset is within bounds in get_config() This condition checks "len" but it does not check "offset" and that could result in an out of bounds read if "offset > dev->config_size". The problem is that since both variables are unsigned the "dev->config_size - offset" subtraction would result in a very high unsigned value. I think these checks might not be necessary because "len" and "offset" are supposed to already have been validated using the vhost_vdpa_config_validate() function. But I do not know the code perfectly, and I like to be safe.
CVE-2021-47604
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vduse: check that offset is within bounds in get_config() This condition checks "len" but it does not check "offset" and that could result in an out of bounds read if "offset > dev->config_size". The problem is that since both variables are unsigned the "dev->config_size - offset" subtraction would result in a very high unsigned value. I think these checks might not be necessary because "len" and "offset" are supposed to already have been validated using the vhost_vdpa_config_validate() function. But I do not know the code perfectly, and I like to be safe.
CVE-2021-47604
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: v ...
GHSA-5583-qmch-62x6
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vduse: check that offset is within bounds in get_config() This condition checks "len" but it does not check "offset" and that could result in an out of bounds read if "offset > dev->config_size". The problem is that since both variables are unsigned the "dev->config_size - offset" subtraction would result in a very high unsigned value. I think these checks might not be necessary because "len" and "offset" are supposed to already have been validated using the vhost_vdpa_config_validate() function. But I do not know the code perfectly, and I like to be safe.
BDU:2025-01313
Уязвимость функции vduse_vdpa_get_config() драйвера vDPA ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
ALT-PU-2021-3610
ALT-PU-2021-3610: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 5.15.11-alt1
ROS-20241202-02
Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt
ALT-PU-2021-3644
ALT-PU-2021-3644: package `kernel-image-mp` update to version 5.15.12-alt1
SUSE-SU-2024:2394-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2024:2372-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ALT-PU-2022-1016
ALT-PU-2022-1016: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 5.15.13-alt1
ALT-PU-2022-1015
ALT-PU-2022-1015: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 5.15.13-alt1
SUSE-SU-2024:2939-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2021-47604 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vduse: check that offset is within bounds in get_config() This condition checks "len" but it does not check "offset" and that could result in an out of bounds read if "offset > dev->config_size". The problem is that since both variables are unsigned the "dev->config_size - offset" subtraction would result in a very high unsigned value. I think these checks might not be necessary because "len" and "offset" are supposed to already have been validated using the vhost_vdpa_config_validate() function. But I do not know the code perfectly, and I like to be safe. | CVSS3: 7.1 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
CVE-2021-47604 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vduse: check that offset is within bounds in get_config() This condition checks "len" but it does not check "offset" and that could result in an out of bounds read if "offset > dev->config_size". The problem is that since both variables are unsigned the "dev->config_size - offset" subtraction would result in a very high unsigned value. I think these checks might not be necessary because "len" and "offset" are supposed to already have been validated using the vhost_vdpa_config_validate() function. But I do not know the code perfectly, and I like to be safe. | CVSS3: 4.4 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
CVE-2021-47604 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vduse: check that offset is within bounds in get_config() This condition checks "len" but it does not check "offset" and that could result in an out of bounds read if "offset > dev->config_size". The problem is that since both variables are unsigned the "dev->config_size - offset" subtraction would result in a very high unsigned value. I think these checks might not be necessary because "len" and "offset" are supposed to already have been validated using the vhost_vdpa_config_validate() function. But I do not know the code perfectly, and I like to be safe. | CVSS3: 7.1 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
CVE-2021-47604 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: v ... | CVSS3: 7.1 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
GHSA-5583-qmch-62x6 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vduse: check that offset is within bounds in get_config() This condition checks "len" but it does not check "offset" and that could result in an out of bounds read if "offset > dev->config_size". The problem is that since both variables are unsigned the "dev->config_size - offset" subtraction would result in a very high unsigned value. I think these checks might not be necessary because "len" and "offset" are supposed to already have been validated using the vhost_vdpa_config_validate() function. But I do not know the code perfectly, and I like to be safe. | CVSS3: 7.1 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
BDU:2025-01313 Уязвимость функции vduse_vdpa_get_config() драйвера vDPA ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании | CVSS3: 7.1 | 0% Низкий | почти 5 лет назад | |
ALT-PU-2021-3610 ALT-PU-2021-3610: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 5.15.11-alt1 | CVSS3: 8.8 | почти 5 лет назад | ||
ROS-20241202-02 Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt | CVSS3: 8.8 | почти 2 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2021-3644 ALT-PU-2021-3644: package `kernel-image-mp` update to version 5.15.12-alt1 | CVSS3: 8.8 | почти 5 лет назад | ||
SUSE-SU-2024:2394-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 2 лет назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2024:2372-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 2 лет назад | |||
ALT-PU-2022-1016 ALT-PU-2022-1016: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 5.15.13-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | почти 5 лет назад | ||
ALT-PU-2022-1015 ALT-PU-2022-1015: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 5.15.13-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | почти 5 лет назад | ||
SUSE-SU-2024:2939-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 2 лет назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу