Поиск уязвимостей
Количество 21
Количество 21
CVE-2024-26629
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER The test on so_count in nfsd4_release_lockowner() is nonsense and harmful. Revert to using check_for_locks(), changing that to not sleep. First: harmful. As is documented in the kdoc comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner(), the test on so_count can transiently return a false positive resulting in a return of NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD when in fact no locks are held. This is clearly a protocol violation and with the Linux NFS client it can cause incorrect behaviour. If RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is sent while some other thread is still processing a LOCK request which failed because, at the time that request was received, the given owner held a conflicting lock, then the nfsd thread processing that LOCK request can hold a reference (conflock) to the lock owner that causes nfsd4_release_lockowner() to return an incorrect error. The Linux NFS client ignores that NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD error because it never sends...
CVE-2024-26629
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER The test on so_count in nfsd4_release_lockowner() is nonsense and harmful. Revert to using check_for_locks(), changing that to not sleep. First: harmful. As is documented in the kdoc comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner(), the test on so_count can transiently return a false positive resulting in a return of NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD when in fact no locks are held. This is clearly a protocol violation and with the Linux NFS client it can cause incorrect behaviour. If RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is sent while some other thread is still processing a LOCK request which failed because, at the time that request was received, the given owner held a conflicting lock, then the nfsd thread processing that LOCK request can hold a reference (conflock) to the lock owner that causes nfsd4_release_lockowner() to return an incorrect error. The Linux NFS client ignores that NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD error because it never sends...
CVE-2024-26629
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER The test on so_count in nfsd4_release_lockowner() is nonsense and harmful. Revert to using check_for_locks(), changing that to not sleep. First: harmful. As is documented in the kdoc comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner(), the test on so_count can transiently return a false positive resulting in a return of NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD when in fact no locks are held. This is clearly a protocol violation and with the Linux NFS client it can cause incorrect behaviour. If RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is sent while some other thread is still processing a LOCK request which failed because, at the time that request was received, the given owner held a conflicting lock, then the nfsd thread processing that LOCK request can hold a reference (conflock) to the lock owner that causes nfsd4_release_lockowner() to return an incorrect error. The Linux NFS client ignores that NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD error because it never sen
CVE-2024-26629
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: n ...
GHSA-x66g-5578-7px9
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER The test on so_count in nfsd4_release_lockowner() is nonsense and harmful. Revert to using check_for_locks(), changing that to not sleep. First: harmful. As is documented in the kdoc comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner(), the test on so_count can transiently return a false positive resulting in a return of NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD when in fact no locks are held. This is clearly a protocol violation and with the Linux NFS client it can cause incorrect behaviour. If RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is sent while some other thread is still processing a LOCK request which failed because, at the time that request was received, the given owner held a conflicting lock, then the nfsd thread processing that LOCK request can hold a reference (conflock) to the lock owner that causes nfsd4_release_lockowner() to return an incorrect error. The Linux NFS client ignores that NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD error because it never ...
BDU:2024-03656
Уязвимость функции check_for_locks() в модуле fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c сервера файловой системы NFS ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
RLSA-2024:6567
Moderate: kernel security update
ELSA-2024-6567
ELSA-2024-6567: kernel security update (MODERATE)
ROS-20240821-02
Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt
ALT-PU-2024-2868
ALT-PU-2024-2868: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.79-alt1
ALT-PU-2024-18361
ALT-PU-2024-18361: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 6.1.79-alt1
ALT-PU-2024-1921
ALT-PU-2024-1921: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.6.15-alt1
ALT-PU-2024-18204
ALT-PU-2024-18204: package `kernel-image-pine` update to version 6.6.15-alt1
ALT-PU-2024-3144
ALT-PU-2024-3144: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.1.79-alt1.rt25
SUSE-SU-2024:1466-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2024:1322-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2024:1480-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2024:1490-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ALT-PU-2024-1865
ALT-PU-2024-1865: package `kernel-image-mp` update to version 6.6.16-alt1
ALT-PU-2024-6818
ALT-PU-2024-6818: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.6.23-alt1
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-26629 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER The test on so_count in nfsd4_release_lockowner() is nonsense and harmful. Revert to using check_for_locks(), changing that to not sleep. First: harmful. As is documented in the kdoc comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner(), the test on so_count can transiently return a false positive resulting in a return of NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD when in fact no locks are held. This is clearly a protocol violation and with the Linux NFS client it can cause incorrect behaviour. If RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is sent while some other thread is still processing a LOCK request which failed because, at the time that request was received, the given owner held a conflicting lock, then the nfsd thread processing that LOCK request can hold a reference (conflock) to the lock owner that causes nfsd4_release_lockowner() to return an incorrect error. The Linux NFS client ignores that NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD error because it never sends... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
CVE-2024-26629 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER The test on so_count in nfsd4_release_lockowner() is nonsense and harmful. Revert to using check_for_locks(), changing that to not sleep. First: harmful. As is documented in the kdoc comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner(), the test on so_count can transiently return a false positive resulting in a return of NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD when in fact no locks are held. This is clearly a protocol violation and with the Linux NFS client it can cause incorrect behaviour. If RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is sent while some other thread is still processing a LOCK request which failed because, at the time that request was received, the given owner held a conflicting lock, then the nfsd thread processing that LOCK request can hold a reference (conflock) to the lock owner that causes nfsd4_release_lockowner() to return an incorrect error. The Linux NFS client ignores that NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD error because it never sends... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
CVE-2024-26629 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER The test on so_count in nfsd4_release_lockowner() is nonsense and harmful. Revert to using check_for_locks(), changing that to not sleep. First: harmful. As is documented in the kdoc comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner(), the test on so_count can transiently return a false positive resulting in a return of NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD when in fact no locks are held. This is clearly a protocol violation and with the Linux NFS client it can cause incorrect behaviour. If RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is sent while some other thread is still processing a LOCK request which failed because, at the time that request was received, the given owner held a conflicting lock, then the nfsd thread processing that LOCK request can hold a reference (conflock) to the lock owner that causes nfsd4_release_lockowner() to return an incorrect error. The Linux NFS client ignores that NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD error because it never sen | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
CVE-2024-26629 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: n ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
GHSA-x66g-5578-7px9 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER The test on so_count in nfsd4_release_lockowner() is nonsense and harmful. Revert to using check_for_locks(), changing that to not sleep. First: harmful. As is documented in the kdoc comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner(), the test on so_count can transiently return a false positive resulting in a return of NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD when in fact no locks are held. This is clearly a protocol violation and with the Linux NFS client it can cause incorrect behaviour. If RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is sent while some other thread is still processing a LOCK request which failed because, at the time that request was received, the given owner held a conflicting lock, then the nfsd thread processing that LOCK request can hold a reference (conflock) to the lock owner that causes nfsd4_release_lockowner() to return an incorrect error. The Linux NFS client ignores that NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD error because it never ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
BDU:2024-03656 Уязвимость функции check_for_locks() в модуле fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c сервера файловой системы NFS ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании | CVSS3: 5.9 | 0% Низкий | почти 3 года назад | |
RLSA-2024:6567 Moderate: kernel security update | около 2 лет назад | |||
ELSA-2024-6567 ELSA-2024-6567: kernel security update (MODERATE) | около 2 лет назад | |||
ROS-20240821-02 Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt | CVSS3: 9.8 | около 2 лет назад | ||
ALT-PU-2024-2868 ALT-PU-2024-2868: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.79-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.4 | больше 2 лет назад | ||
ALT-PU-2024-18361 ALT-PU-2024-18361: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 6.1.79-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.4 | больше 2 лет назад | ||
ALT-PU-2024-1921 ALT-PU-2024-1921: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.6.15-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | почти 3 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2024-18204 ALT-PU-2024-18204: package `kernel-image-pine` update to version 6.6.15-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | почти 3 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2024-3144 ALT-PU-2024-3144: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.1.79-alt1.rt25 | CVSS3: 9.4 | больше 2 лет назад | ||
SUSE-SU-2024:1466-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 2 лет назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2024:1322-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 2 лет назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2024:1480-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 2 лет назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2024:1490-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 2 лет назад | |||
ALT-PU-2024-1865 ALT-PU-2024-1865: package `kernel-image-mp` update to version 6.6.16-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | почти 3 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2024-6818 ALT-PU-2024-6818: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.6.23-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.4 | больше 2 лет назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу