Поиск уязвимостей
Количество 17
Количество 17
CVE-2024-56717
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic() Packets injected by the CPU should have a SRC_PORT field equal to the CPU port module index in the Analyzer block (ocelot->num_phys_ports). The blamed commit copied the ocelot_ifh_set_basic() call incorrectly from ocelot_xmit_common() in net/dsa/tag_ocelot.c. Instead of calling with "x", it calls with BIT_ULL(x), but the field is not a port mask, but rather a single port index. [ side note: this is the technical debt of code duplication :( ] The error used to be silent and doesn't appear to have other user-visible manifestations, but with new changes in the packing library, it now fails loudly as follows: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Cannot store 0x40 inside bits 46-43 - will truncate sja1105 spi2.0: xmit timed out WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 102 at lib/packing.c:98 __pack+0x90/0x198 sja1105 spi2.0: timed out polling for tstamp CPU: 1 UID...
CVE-2024-56717
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic() Packets injected by the CPU should have a SRC_PORT field equal to the CPU port module index in the Analyzer block (ocelot->num_phys_ports). The blamed commit copied the ocelot_ifh_set_basic() call incorrectly from ocelot_xmit_common() in net/dsa/tag_ocelot.c. Instead of calling with "x", it calls with BIT_ULL(x), but the field is not a port mask, but rather a single port index. [ side note: this is the technical debt of code duplication :( ] The error used to be silent and doesn't appear to have other user-visible manifestations, but with new changes in the packing library, it now fails loudly as follows: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Cannot store 0x40 inside bits 46-43 - will truncate sja1105 spi2.0: xmit timed out WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 102 at lib/packing.c:98 __pack+0x90/0x198 sja1105 spi2.0: timed out polling for tstamp CPU: 1 UID...
CVE-2024-56717
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic() Packets injected by the CPU should have a SRC_PORT field equal to the CPU port module index in the Analyzer block (ocelot->num_phys_ports). The blamed commit copied the ocelot_ifh_set_basic() call incorrectly from ocelot_xmit_common() in net/dsa/tag_ocelot.c. Instead of calling with "x", it calls with BIT_ULL(x), but the field is not a port mask, but rather a single port index. [ side note: this is the technical debt of code duplication :( ] The error used to be silent and doesn't appear to have other user-visible manifestations, but with new changes in the packing library, it now fails loudly as follows: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Cannot store 0x40 inside bits 46-43 - will truncate sja1105 spi2.0: xmit timed out WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 102 at lib/packing.c:98 __pack+0x90/0x198 sja1105 spi2.0: timed out polling for tstamp CPU: 1
CVE-2024-56717
net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic()
CVE-2024-56717
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: n ...
GHSA-c7fp-8j89-w969
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic() Packets injected by the CPU should have a SRC_PORT field equal to the CPU port module index in the Analyzer block (ocelot->num_phys_ports). The blamed commit copied the ocelot_ifh_set_basic() call incorrectly from ocelot_xmit_common() in net/dsa/tag_ocelot.c. Instead of calling with "x", it calls with BIT_ULL(x), but the field is not a port mask, but rather a single port index. [ side note: this is the technical debt of code duplication :( ] The error used to be silent and doesn't appear to have other user-visible manifestations, but with new changes in the packing library, it now fails loudly as follows: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Cannot store 0x40 inside bits 46-43 - will truncate sja1105 spi2.0: xmit timed out WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 102 at lib/packing.c:98 __pack+0x90/0x198 sja1105 spi2.0: timed out polling for tstamp CPU:...
BDU:2025-04132
Уязвимость функции ocelot_ifh_set_basic() компонента ocelot.c ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
ALT-PU-2025-1288
ALT-PU-2025-1288: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.123-alt1
ROS-20250421-01
Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt
ALT-PU-2025-3496
ALT-PU-2025-3496: package `kernel-image-6.6` update to version 6.6.69-alt1
ALT-PU-2025-3483
ALT-PU-2025-3483: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.9-alt1
ALT-PU-2025-1256
ALT-PU-2025-1256: package `kernel-image-pine` update to version 6.12.9-alt1
ALT-PU-2025-1925
ALT-PU-2025-1925: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.12.11-alt1
ELSA-2025-20530
ELSA-2025-20530: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
ELSA-2025-20480
ELSA-2025-20480: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
ALT-PU-2025-12647
ALT-PU-2025-12647: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.49-alt1
ALT-PU-2026-9924
ALT-PU-2026-9924: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.94-alt1
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-56717 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic() Packets injected by the CPU should have a SRC_PORT field equal to the CPU port module index in the Analyzer block (ocelot->num_phys_ports). The blamed commit copied the ocelot_ifh_set_basic() call incorrectly from ocelot_xmit_common() in net/dsa/tag_ocelot.c. Instead of calling with "x", it calls with BIT_ULL(x), but the field is not a port mask, but rather a single port index. [ side note: this is the technical debt of code duplication :( ] The error used to be silent and doesn't appear to have other user-visible manifestations, but with new changes in the packing library, it now fails loudly as follows: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Cannot store 0x40 inside bits 46-43 - will truncate sja1105 spi2.0: xmit timed out WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 102 at lib/packing.c:98 __pack+0x90/0x198 sja1105 spi2.0: timed out polling for tstamp CPU: 1 UID... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | почти 2 года назад | |
CVE-2024-56717 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic() Packets injected by the CPU should have a SRC_PORT field equal to the CPU port module index in the Analyzer block (ocelot->num_phys_ports). The blamed commit copied the ocelot_ifh_set_basic() call incorrectly from ocelot_xmit_common() in net/dsa/tag_ocelot.c. Instead of calling with "x", it calls with BIT_ULL(x), but the field is not a port mask, but rather a single port index. [ side note: this is the technical debt of code duplication :( ] The error used to be silent and doesn't appear to have other user-visible manifestations, but with new changes in the packing library, it now fails loudly as follows: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Cannot store 0x40 inside bits 46-43 - will truncate sja1105 spi2.0: xmit timed out WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 102 at lib/packing.c:98 __pack+0x90/0x198 sja1105 spi2.0: timed out polling for tstamp CPU: 1 UID... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | почти 2 года назад | |
CVE-2024-56717 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic() Packets injected by the CPU should have a SRC_PORT field equal to the CPU port module index in the Analyzer block (ocelot->num_phys_ports). The blamed commit copied the ocelot_ifh_set_basic() call incorrectly from ocelot_xmit_common() in net/dsa/tag_ocelot.c. Instead of calling with "x", it calls with BIT_ULL(x), but the field is not a port mask, but rather a single port index. [ side note: this is the technical debt of code duplication :( ] The error used to be silent and doesn't appear to have other user-visible manifestations, but with new changes in the packing library, it now fails loudly as follows: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Cannot store 0x40 inside bits 46-43 - will truncate sja1105 spi2.0: xmit timed out WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 102 at lib/packing.c:98 __pack+0x90/0x198 sja1105 spi2.0: timed out polling for tstamp CPU: 1 | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | почти 2 года назад | |
CVE-2024-56717 net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic() | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
CVE-2024-56717 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: n ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | почти 2 года назад | |
GHSA-c7fp-8j89-w969 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic() Packets injected by the CPU should have a SRC_PORT field equal to the CPU port module index in the Analyzer block (ocelot->num_phys_ports). The blamed commit copied the ocelot_ifh_set_basic() call incorrectly from ocelot_xmit_common() in net/dsa/tag_ocelot.c. Instead of calling with "x", it calls with BIT_ULL(x), but the field is not a port mask, but rather a single port index. [ side note: this is the technical debt of code duplication :( ] The error used to be silent and doesn't appear to have other user-visible manifestations, but with new changes in the packing library, it now fails loudly as follows: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Cannot store 0x40 inside bits 46-43 - will truncate sja1105 spi2.0: xmit timed out WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 102 at lib/packing.c:98 __pack+0x90/0x198 sja1105 spi2.0: timed out polling for tstamp CPU:... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | почти 2 года назад | |
BDU:2025-04132 Уязвимость функции ocelot_ifh_set_basic() компонента ocelot.c ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | почти 2 года назад | |
ALT-PU-2025-1288 ALT-PU-2025-1288: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.123-alt1 | CVSS3: 7.8 | почти 2 года назад | ||
ROS-20250421-01 Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt | CVSS3: 7.8 | больше 1 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2025-3496 ALT-PU-2025-3496: package `kernel-image-6.6` update to version 6.6.69-alt1 | CVSS3: 7.8 | больше 1 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2025-3483 ALT-PU-2025-3483: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.9-alt1 | CVSS3: 8 | больше 1 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2025-1256 ALT-PU-2025-1256: package `kernel-image-pine` update to version 6.12.9-alt1 | CVSS3: 8 | почти 2 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2025-1925 ALT-PU-2025-1925: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.12.11-alt1 | CVSS3: 8 | почти 2 года назад | ||
ELSA-2025-20530 ELSA-2025-20530: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | около 1 года назад | |||
ELSA-2025-20480 ELSA-2025-20480: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | больше 1 года назад | |||
ALT-PU-2025-12647 ALT-PU-2025-12647: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.49-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | около 1 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2026-9924 ALT-PU-2026-9924: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.94-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | 5 месяцев назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу