Количество 12
Количество 12
GHSA-5x95-66xj-7chm
An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.)
CVE-2019-13057
An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.)
CVE-2019-13057
An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.)
CVE-2019-13057
An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.)
CVE-2019-13057
An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When ...
BDU:2019-04729
Уязвимость демона slapd пакета OpenLDAP, позволяющая нарушителю раскрыть защищаемую информацию
SUSE-SU-2020:14353-1
Security update for openldap2
SUSE-SU-2019:2390-1
Security update for openldap2
openSUSE-SU-2019:2176-1
Security update for openldap2
openSUSE-SU-2019:2157-1
Security update for openldap2
SUSE-SU-2020:1210-1
Security update for openldap2
SUSE-SU-2019:2395-1
Security update for openldap2
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-5x95-66xj-7chm An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.) | CVSS3: 4.9 | 3% Низкий | больше 4 лет назад |
 | CVE-2019-13057 An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.) | CVSS3: 4.9 | 3% Низкий | около 7 лет назад |
 | CVE-2019-13057 An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.) | CVSS3: 6.5 | 3% Низкий | около 7 лет назад |
 | CVE-2019-13057 An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.) | CVSS3: 4.9 | 3% Низкий | около 7 лет назад |
| CVE-2019-13057 An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When ... | CVSS3: 4.9 | 3% Низкий | около 7 лет назад |
 | BDU:2019-04729 Уязвимость демона slapd пакета OpenLDAP, позволяющая нарушителю раскрыть защищаемую информацию | CVSS3: 6.5 | 3% Низкий | около 7 лет назад |
 | SUSE-SU-2020:14353-1 Security update for openldap2 | больше 6 лет назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2019:2390-1 Security update for openldap2 | почти 7 лет назад | ||
| openSUSE-SU-2019:2176-1 Security update for openldap2 | почти 7 лет назад | ||
| openSUSE-SU-2019:2157-1 Security update for openldap2 | почти 7 лет назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2020:1210-1 Security update for openldap2 | больше 6 лет назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2019:2395-1 Security update for openldap2 | почти 7 лет назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу