ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ 16
ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ 16
GHSA-wcfp-94c7-jmv4
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: phy: Don't register LEDs for genphy If a PHY has no driver, the genphy driver is probed/removed directly in phy_attach/detach. If the PHY's ofnode has an "leds" subnode, then the LEDs will be (un)registered when probing/removing the genphy driver. This could occur if the leds are for a non-generic driver that isn't loaded for whatever reason. Synchronously removing the PHY device in phy_detach leads to the following deadlock: rtnl_lock() ndo_close() ... phy_detach() phy_remove() phy_leds_unregister() led_classdev_unregister() led_trigger_set() netdev_trigger_deactivate() unregister_netdevice_notifier() rtnl_lock() There is a corresponding deadlock on the open/register side of things (and that one is reported by lockdep), but it requires a race while this one is ...
CVE-2025-38537
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: phy: Don't register LEDs for genphy If a PHY has no driver, the genphy driver is probed/removed directly in phy_attach/detach. If the PHY's ofnode has an "leds" subnode, then the LEDs will be (un)registered when probing/removing the genphy driver. This could occur if the leds are for a non-generic driver that isn't loaded for whatever reason. Synchronously removing the PHY device in phy_detach leads to the following deadlock: rtnl_lock() ndo_close() ... phy_detach() phy_remove() phy_leds_unregister() led_classdev_unregister() led_trigger_set() netdev_trigger_deactivate() unregister_netdevice_notifier() rtnl_lock() There is a corresponding deadlock on the open/register side of things (and that one is reported by lockdep), but it requires a race while this one is deterministic. Generic PHYs do not support LEDs anyway, so don't bother registering them.
CVE-2025-38537
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: phy: Don't register LEDs for genphy If a PHY has no driver, the genphy driver is probed/removed directly in phy_attach/detach. If the PHY's ofnode has an "leds" subnode, then the LEDs will be (un)registered when probing/removing the genphy driver. This could occur if the leds are for a non-generic driver that isn't loaded for whatever reason. Synchronously removing the PHY device in phy_detach leads to the following deadlock: rtnl_lock() ndo_close() ... phy_detach() phy_remove() phy_leds_unregister() led_classdev_unregister() led_trigger_set() netdev_trigger_deactivate() unregister_netdevice_notifier() rtnl_lock() There is a corresponding deadlock on the open/register side of things (and that one is reported by lockdep), but it requires a race while this one is deterministic. Generic PHYs do not support LEDs anyway, so don't bother registering them.
CVE-2025-38537
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: phy: Don't register LEDs for genphy If a PHY has no driver, the genphy driver is probed/removed directly in phy_attach/detach. If the PHY's ofnode has an "leds" subnode, then the LEDs will be (un)registered when probing/removing the genphy driver. This could occur if the leds are for a non-generic driver that isn't loaded for whatever reason. Synchronously removing the PHY device in phy_detach leads to the following deadlock: rtnl_lock() ndo_close() ... phy_detach() phy_remove() phy_leds_unregister() led_classdev_unregister() led_trigger_set() netdev_trigger_deactivate() unregister_netdevice_notifier() rtnl_lock() There is a corresponding deadlock on the open/register side of things (and that one is reported by lockdep), but it requires a race while this one is det
CVE-2025-38537
net: phy: Don't register LEDs for genphy
CVE-2025-38537
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: n ...
BDU:2025-14969
Π£ΡΠ·Π²ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΠ° /net/phy/phy_device.c ΡΠ΄ΡΠ° ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Linux, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Ρ Π²ΡΠ·Π²Π°ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°Π· Π² ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ
SUSE-SU-2025:03272-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:03301-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:03382-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:03290-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:03602-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:03633-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
openSUSE-SU-2026:20287-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ELSA-2025-20551
ELSA-2025-20551: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
SUSE-SU-2025:03634-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
Π£ΡΠ·Π²ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
Π£ΡΠ·Π²ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ | CVSS | EPSS | ΠΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GHSA-wcfp-94c7-jmv4 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: phy: Don't register LEDs for genphy If a PHY has no driver, the genphy driver is probed/removed directly in phy_attach/detach. If the PHY's ofnode has an "leds" subnode, then the LEDs will be (un)registered when probing/removing the genphy driver. This could occur if the leds are for a non-generic driver that isn't loaded for whatever reason. Synchronously removing the PHY device in phy_detach leads to the following deadlock: rtnl_lock() ndo_close() ... phy_detach() phy_remove() phy_leds_unregister() led_classdev_unregister() led_trigger_set() netdev_trigger_deactivate() unregister_netdevice_notifier() rtnl_lock() There is a corresponding deadlock on the open/register side of things (and that one is reported by lockdep), but it requires a race while this one is ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% ΠΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΉ | 10 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |
CVE-2025-38537 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: phy: Don't register LEDs for genphy If a PHY has no driver, the genphy driver is probed/removed directly in phy_attach/detach. If the PHY's ofnode has an "leds" subnode, then the LEDs will be (un)registered when probing/removing the genphy driver. This could occur if the leds are for a non-generic driver that isn't loaded for whatever reason. Synchronously removing the PHY device in phy_detach leads to the following deadlock: rtnl_lock() ndo_close() ... phy_detach() phy_remove() phy_leds_unregister() led_classdev_unregister() led_trigger_set() netdev_trigger_deactivate() unregister_netdevice_notifier() rtnl_lock() There is a corresponding deadlock on the open/register side of things (and that one is reported by lockdep), but it requires a race while this one is deterministic. Generic PHYs do not support LEDs anyway, so don't bother registering them. | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% ΠΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΉ | 10 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |
CVE-2025-38537 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: phy: Don't register LEDs for genphy If a PHY has no driver, the genphy driver is probed/removed directly in phy_attach/detach. If the PHY's ofnode has an "leds" subnode, then the LEDs will be (un)registered when probing/removing the genphy driver. This could occur if the leds are for a non-generic driver that isn't loaded for whatever reason. Synchronously removing the PHY device in phy_detach leads to the following deadlock: rtnl_lock() ndo_close() ... phy_detach() phy_remove() phy_leds_unregister() led_classdev_unregister() led_trigger_set() netdev_trigger_deactivate() unregister_netdevice_notifier() rtnl_lock() There is a corresponding deadlock on the open/register side of things (and that one is reported by lockdep), but it requires a race while this one is deterministic. Generic PHYs do not support LEDs anyway, so don't bother registering them. | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% ΠΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΉ | 10 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |
CVE-2025-38537 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: phy: Don't register LEDs for genphy If a PHY has no driver, the genphy driver is probed/removed directly in phy_attach/detach. If the PHY's ofnode has an "leds" subnode, then the LEDs will be (un)registered when probing/removing the genphy driver. This could occur if the leds are for a non-generic driver that isn't loaded for whatever reason. Synchronously removing the PHY device in phy_detach leads to the following deadlock: rtnl_lock() ndo_close() ... phy_detach() phy_remove() phy_leds_unregister() led_classdev_unregister() led_trigger_set() netdev_trigger_deactivate() unregister_netdevice_notifier() rtnl_lock() There is a corresponding deadlock on the open/register side of things (and that one is reported by lockdep), but it requires a race while this one is det | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% ΠΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΉ | 10 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |
CVE-2025-38537 net: phy: Don't register LEDs for genphy | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% ΠΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΉ | 10 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |
CVE-2025-38537 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: n ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% ΠΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΉ | 10 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |
BDU:2025-14969 Π£ΡΠ·Π²ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΠ° /net/phy/phy_device.c ΡΠ΄ΡΠ° ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Linux, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Ρ Π²ΡΠ·Π²Π°ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°Π· Π² ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% ΠΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΉ | 12 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |
SUSE-SU-2025:03272-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 9 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:03301-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 9 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:03382-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 9 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:03290-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 9 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:03602-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 8 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:03633-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 8 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |||
openSUSE-SU-2026:20287-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 4 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ° Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |||
ELSA-2025-20551 ELSA-2025-20551: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | 10 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:03634-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 8 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ |
Π£ΡΠ·Π²ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡ