Поиск уязвимостей
Количество 21
Количество 21
CVE-2025-22003
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: ucan: fix out of bound read in strscpy() source Commit 7fdaf8966aae ("can: ucan: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()") unintentionally introduced a one byte out of bound read on strscpy()'s source argument (which is kind of ironic knowing that strscpy() is meant to be a more secure alternative :)). Let's consider below buffers: dest[len + 1]; /* will be NUL terminated */ src[len]; /* may not be NUL terminated */ When doing: strncpy(dest, src, len); dest[len] = '\0'; strncpy() will read up to len bytes from src. On the other hand: strscpy(dest, src, len + 1); will read up to len + 1 bytes from src, that is to say, an out of bound read of one byte will occur on src if it is not NUL terminated. Note that the src[len] byte is never copied, but strscpy() still needs to read it to check whether a truncation occurred or not. This exact pattern happened in ucan. The root cause is that the source is not NUL terminated...
CVE-2025-22003
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: ucan: fix out of bound read in strscpy() source Commit 7fdaf8966aae ("can: ucan: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()") unintentionally introduced a one byte out of bound read on strscpy()'s source argument (which is kind of ironic knowing that strscpy() is meant to be a more secure alternative :)). Let's consider below buffers: dest[len + 1]; /* will be NUL terminated */ src[len]; /* may not be NUL terminated */ When doing: strncpy(dest, src, len); dest[len] = '\0'; strncpy() will read up to len bytes from src. On the other hand: strscpy(dest, src, len + 1); will read up to len + 1 bytes from src, that is to say, an out of bound read of one byte will occur on src if it is not NUL terminated. Note that the src[len] byte is never copied, but strscpy() still needs to read it to check whether a truncation occurred or not. This exact pattern happened in ucan. The root cause is that the source is not NUL terminated...
CVE-2025-22003
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: ucan: fix out of bound read in strscpy() source Commit 7fdaf8966aae ("can: ucan: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()") unintentionally introduced a one byte out of bound read on strscpy()'s source argument (which is kind of ironic knowing that strscpy() is meant to be a more secure alternative :)). Let's consider below buffers: dest[len + 1]; /* will be NUL terminated */ src[len]; /* may not be NUL terminated */ When doing: strncpy(dest, src, len); dest[len] = '\0'; strncpy() will read up to len bytes from src. On the other hand: strscpy(dest, src, len + 1); will read up to len + 1 bytes from src, that is to say, an out of bound read of one byte will occur on src if it is not NUL terminated. Note that the src[len] byte is never copied, but strscpy() still needs to read it to check whether a truncation occurred or not. This exact pattern happened in ucan. The root cause is that the source is
CVE-2025-22003
can: ucan: fix out of bound read in strscpy() source
CVE-2025-22003
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: c ...
GHSA-2648-xh5w-2w3q
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: ucan: fix out of bound read in strscpy() source Commit 7fdaf8966aae ("can: ucan: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()") unintentionally introduced a one byte out of bound read on strscpy()'s source argument (which is kind of ironic knowing that strscpy() is meant to be a more secure alternative :)). Let's consider below buffers: dest[len + 1]; /* will be NUL terminated */ src[len]; /* may not be NUL terminated */ When doing: strncpy(dest, src, len); dest[len] = '\0'; strncpy() will read up to len bytes from src. On the other hand: strscpy(dest, src, len + 1); will read up to len + 1 bytes from src, that is to say, an out of bound read of one byte will occur on src if it is not NUL terminated. Note that the src[len] byte is never copied, but strscpy() still needs to read it to check whether a truncation occurred or not. This exact pattern happened in ucan. The root cause is that the source...
BDU:2025-11624
Уязвимость модуля drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
ROS-20260120-8035
Уязвимость kernel-lt
ALT-PU-2025-16452
ALT-PU-2025-16452: package `kernel-image-pine` update to version 6.12.22-alt1
ALT-PU-2025-16506
ALT-PU-2025-16506: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.21-alt1
SUSE-SU-2025:01707-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:01614-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:01951-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:01967-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:01964-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:01919-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ALT-PU-2025-5786
ALT-PU-2025-5786: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.12.24-alt1
ELSA-2025-20530
ELSA-2025-20530: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
ELSA-2025-20480
ELSA-2025-20480: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
ALT-PU-2025-12647
ALT-PU-2025-12647: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.49-alt1
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2025-22003 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: ucan: fix out of bound read in strscpy() source Commit 7fdaf8966aae ("can: ucan: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()") unintentionally introduced a one byte out of bound read on strscpy()'s source argument (which is kind of ironic knowing that strscpy() is meant to be a more secure alternative :)). Let's consider below buffers: dest[len + 1]; /* will be NUL terminated */ src[len]; /* may not be NUL terminated */ When doing: strncpy(dest, src, len); dest[len] = '\0'; strncpy() will read up to len bytes from src. On the other hand: strscpy(dest, src, len + 1); will read up to len + 1 bytes from src, that is to say, an out of bound read of one byte will occur on src if it is not NUL terminated. Note that the src[len] byte is never copied, but strscpy() still needs to read it to check whether a truncation occurred or not. This exact pattern happened in ucan. The root cause is that the source is not NUL terminated... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
CVE-2025-22003 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: ucan: fix out of bound read in strscpy() source Commit 7fdaf8966aae ("can: ucan: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()") unintentionally introduced a one byte out of bound read on strscpy()'s source argument (which is kind of ironic knowing that strscpy() is meant to be a more secure alternative :)). Let's consider below buffers: dest[len + 1]; /* will be NUL terminated */ src[len]; /* may not be NUL terminated */ When doing: strncpy(dest, src, len); dest[len] = '\0'; strncpy() will read up to len bytes from src. On the other hand: strscpy(dest, src, len + 1); will read up to len + 1 bytes from src, that is to say, an out of bound read of one byte will occur on src if it is not NUL terminated. Note that the src[len] byte is never copied, but strscpy() still needs to read it to check whether a truncation occurred or not. This exact pattern happened in ucan. The root cause is that the source is not NUL terminated... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
CVE-2025-22003 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: ucan: fix out of bound read in strscpy() source Commit 7fdaf8966aae ("can: ucan: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()") unintentionally introduced a one byte out of bound read on strscpy()'s source argument (which is kind of ironic knowing that strscpy() is meant to be a more secure alternative :)). Let's consider below buffers: dest[len + 1]; /* will be NUL terminated */ src[len]; /* may not be NUL terminated */ When doing: strncpy(dest, src, len); dest[len] = '\0'; strncpy() will read up to len bytes from src. On the other hand: strscpy(dest, src, len + 1); will read up to len + 1 bytes from src, that is to say, an out of bound read of one byte will occur on src if it is not NUL terminated. Note that the src[len] byte is never copied, but strscpy() still needs to read it to check whether a truncation occurred or not. This exact pattern happened in ucan. The root cause is that the source is | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
CVE-2025-22003 can: ucan: fix out of bound read in strscpy() source | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
CVE-2025-22003 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: c ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
GHSA-2648-xh5w-2w3q In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: ucan: fix out of bound read in strscpy() source Commit 7fdaf8966aae ("can: ucan: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()") unintentionally introduced a one byte out of bound read on strscpy()'s source argument (which is kind of ironic knowing that strscpy() is meant to be a more secure alternative :)). Let's consider below buffers: dest[len + 1]; /* will be NUL terminated */ src[len]; /* may not be NUL terminated */ When doing: strncpy(dest, src, len); dest[len] = '\0'; strncpy() will read up to len bytes from src. On the other hand: strscpy(dest, src, len + 1); will read up to len + 1 bytes from src, that is to say, an out of bound read of one byte will occur on src if it is not NUL terminated. Note that the src[len] byte is never copied, but strscpy() still needs to read it to check whether a truncation occurred or not. This exact pattern happened in ucan. The root cause is that the source... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
BDU:2025-11624 Уязвимость модуля drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
ROS-20260120-8035 Уязвимость kernel-lt | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 10 месяцев назад | |
ALT-PU-2025-16452 ALT-PU-2025-16452: package `kernel-image-pine` update to version 6.12.22-alt1 | CVSS3: 8.6 | больше 1 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2025-16506 ALT-PU-2025-16506: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.21-alt1 | CVSS3: 8.6 | больше 1 года назад | ||
SUSE-SU-2025:01707-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:01614-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:01951-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:01967-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:01964-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:01919-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 1 года назад | |||
ALT-PU-2025-5786 ALT-PU-2025-5786: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.12.24-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | больше 1 года назад | ||
ELSA-2025-20530 ELSA-2025-20530: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | около 1 года назад | |||
ELSA-2025-20480 ELSA-2025-20480: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | больше 1 года назад | |||
ALT-PU-2025-12647 ALT-PU-2025-12647: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.49-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | около 1 года назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу