Количество 20
Количество 20
CVE-2026-52946
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal. When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list. However, they are frequently called from softirq context: - send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync - send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ) The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism: 1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait(). 2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers. 3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception). 4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire read_lock(&tasklist_lock), ...
CVE-2026-52946
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal. When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list. However, they are frequently called from softirq context: - send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync - send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ) The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism: 1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait(). 2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers. 3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception). 4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire read_lock(&tasklist_lock), ...
CVE-2026-52946
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal. When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list. However, they are frequently called from softirq context: - send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync - send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ) The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism: 1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait(). 2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers. 3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception). 4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire read_lock(&tasklist_
CVE-2026-52946
fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling
CVE-2026-52946
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f ...
ROS-20261013-73-0395
Уязвимость kernel-lt
GHSA-9h35-hqff-9v3w
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal. When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list. However, they are frequently called from softirq context: - send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync - send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ) The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism: 1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait(). 2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers. 3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception). 4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire read_lock(&taskli...
ALT-PU-2026-10474
ALT-PU-2026-10474: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 5.10.260-alt1
SUSE-SU-2026:4282-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ALT-PU-2026-10470
ALT-PU-2026-10470: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.177-alt1
ALT-PU-2026-10111
ALT-PU-2026-10111: package `kernel-image-6.18` update to version 6.18.37-alt1
ELBA-2026-500163
ELBA-2026-500163: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel bug fix update (NA)
SUSE-SU-2026:4254-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2026:4120-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ALT-PU-2026-9890
ALT-PU-2026-9890: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.94-alt1
openSUSE-SU-2026:21910-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ALT-PU-2026-9892
ALT-PU-2026-9892: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.94-alt1
ELSA-2026-500248
ELSA-2026-500248: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
ALT-PU-2026-11671
ALT-PU-2026-11671: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.12.98-alt1
ALT-PU-2026-9924
ALT-PU-2026-9924: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.94-alt1
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2026-52946 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal. When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list. However, they are frequently called from softirq context: - send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync - send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ) The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism: 1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait(). 2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers. 3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception). 4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire read_lock(&tasklist_lock), ... | CVSS3: 7.5 | 0% Низкий | 4 месяца назад | |
CVE-2026-52946 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal. When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list. However, they are frequently called from softirq context: - send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync - send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ) The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism: 1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait(). 2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers. 3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception). 4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire read_lock(&tasklist_lock), ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 4 месяца назад | |
CVE-2026-52946 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal. When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list. However, they are frequently called from softirq context: - send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync - send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ) The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism: 1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait(). 2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers. 3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception). 4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire read_lock(&tasklist_ | CVSS3: 7.5 | 0% Низкий | 4 месяца назад | |
CVE-2026-52946 fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling | 0% Низкий | 4 месяца назад | ||
CVE-2026-52946 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f ... | CVSS3: 7.5 | 0% Низкий | 4 месяца назад | |
ROS-20261013-73-0395 Уязвимость kernel-lt | CVSS3: 7.5 | 0% Низкий | 1 день назад | |
GHSA-9h35-hqff-9v3w In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal. When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list. However, they are frequently called from softirq context: - send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync - send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ) The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism: 1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait(). 2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers. 3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception). 4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire read_lock(&taskli... | CVSS3: 7.5 | 0% Низкий | 4 месяца назад | |
ALT-PU-2026-10474 ALT-PU-2026-10474: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 5.10.260-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | 3 месяца назад | ||
SUSE-SU-2026:4282-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 22 дня назад | |||
ALT-PU-2026-10470 ALT-PU-2026-10470: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.177-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | 3 месяца назад | ||
ALT-PU-2026-10111 ALT-PU-2026-10111: package `kernel-image-6.18` update to version 6.18.37-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | 3 месяца назад | ||
ELBA-2026-500163 ELBA-2026-500163: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel bug fix update (NA) | 2 месяца назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2026:4254-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 27 дней назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2026:4120-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 месяца назад | |||
ALT-PU-2026-9890 ALT-PU-2026-9890: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.94-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | 4 месяца назад | ||
openSUSE-SU-2026:21910-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 22 дня назад | |||
ALT-PU-2026-9892 ALT-PU-2026-9892: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.94-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | 4 месяца назад | ||
ELSA-2026-500248 ELSA-2026-500248: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | около 1 месяца назад | |||
ALT-PU-2026-11671 ALT-PU-2026-11671: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.12.98-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | 2 месяца назад | ||
ALT-PU-2026-9924 ALT-PU-2026-9924: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.94-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | 4 месяца назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу