Количество 4
Количество 4
CVE-2006-6171
ProFTPD 1.3.0a and earlier does not properly set the buffer size limit when CommandBufferSize is specified in the configuration file, which leads to an off-by-two buffer underflow. NOTE: in November 2006, the role of CommandBufferSize was originally associated with CVE-2006-5815, but this was an error stemming from a vague initial disclosure. NOTE: ProFTPD developers dispute this issue, saying that the relevant memory location is overwritten by assignment before further use within the affected function, so this is not a vulnerability
CVE-2006-6171
ProFTPD 1.3.0a and earlier does not properly set the buffer size limit ...
GHSA-fg3g-4994-3829
** DISPUTED ** ProFTPD 1.3.0a and earlier does not properly set the buffer size limit when CommandBufferSize is specified in the configuration file, which leads to an off-by-two buffer underflow. NOTE: in November 2006, the role of CommandBufferSize was originally associated with CVE-2006-5815, but this was an error stemming from a vague initial disclosure. NOTE: ProFTPD developers dispute this issue, saying that the relevant memory location is overwritten by assignment before further use within the affected function, so this is not a vulnerability.
BDU:2015-02016
Уязвимости операционной системы Debian GNU/Linux, позволяющие удаленному злоумышленнику нарушить конфиденциальность, целостность и доступность защищаемой информации
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | CVE-2006-6171 ProFTPD 1.3.0a and earlier does not properly set the buffer size limit when CommandBufferSize is specified in the configuration file, which leads to an off-by-two buffer underflow. NOTE: in November 2006, the role of CommandBufferSize was originally associated with CVE-2006-5815, but this was an error stemming from a vague initial disclosure. NOTE: ProFTPD developers dispute this issue, saying that the relevant memory location is overwritten by assignment before further use within the affected function, so this is not a vulnerability | CVSS2: 7.5 | 4% Низкий | почти 19 лет назад |
| CVE-2006-6171 ProFTPD 1.3.0a and earlier does not properly set the buffer size limit ... | CVSS2: 7.5 | 4% Низкий | почти 19 лет назад |
| GHSA-fg3g-4994-3829 ** DISPUTED ** ProFTPD 1.3.0a and earlier does not properly set the buffer size limit when CommandBufferSize is specified in the configuration file, which leads to an off-by-two buffer underflow. NOTE: in November 2006, the role of CommandBufferSize was originally associated with CVE-2006-5815, but this was an error stemming from a vague initial disclosure. NOTE: ProFTPD developers dispute this issue, saying that the relevant memory location is overwritten by assignment before further use within the affected function, so this is not a vulnerability. | 4% Низкий | больше 3 лет назад | |
 | BDU:2015-02016 Уязвимости операционной системы Debian GNU/Linux, позволяющие удаленному злоумышленнику нарушить конфиденциальность, целостность и доступность защищаемой информации | CVSS2: 10 | около 19 лет назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу