Поиск уязвимостей
Количество 25
Количество 25
CVE-2025-68725
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack Yinhao et al. reported that their fuzzer tool was able to trigger a skb_warn_bad_offload() from netif_skb_features() -> gso_features_check(). When a BPF program - triggered via BPF test infra - pushes the packet to the loopback device via bpf_clone_redirect() then mentioned offload warning can be seen. GSO-related features are then rightfully disabled. We get into this situation due to convert___skb_to_skb() setting gso_segs and gso_size but not gso_type. Technically, it makes sense that this warning triggers since the GSO properties are malformed due to the gso_type. Potentially, the gso_type could be marked non-trustworthy through setting it at least to SKB_GSO_DODGY without any other specific assumptions, but that also feels wrong given we should not go further into the GSO engine in the first place. The checks were added in 121d57af308d ("gso: valida...
CVE-2025-68725
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack Yinhao et al. reported that their fuzzer tool was able to trigger a skb_warn_bad_offload() from netif_skb_features() -> gso_features_check(). When a BPF program - triggered via BPF test infra - pushes the packet to the loopback device via bpf_clone_redirect() then mentioned offload warning can be seen. GSO-related features are then rightfully disabled. We get into this situation due to convert___skb_to_skb() setting gso_segs and gso_size but not gso_type. Technically, it makes sense that this warning triggers since the GSO properties are malformed due to the gso_type. Potentially, the gso_type could be marked non-trustworthy through setting it at least to SKB_GSO_DODGY without any other specific assumptions, but that also feels wrong given we should not go further into the GSO engine in the first place. The checks were added in 121d57af308d ("gso: valida...
CVE-2025-68725
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack Yinhao et al. reported that their fuzzer tool was able to trigger a skb_warn_bad_offload() from netif_skb_features() -> gso_features_check(). When a BPF program - triggered via BPF test infra - pushes the packet to the loopback device via bpf_clone_redirect() then mentioned offload warning can be seen. GSO-related features are then rightfully disabled. We get into this situation due to convert___skb_to_skb() setting gso_segs and gso_size but not gso_type. Technically, it makes sense that this warning triggers since the GSO properties are malformed due to the gso_type. Potentially, the gso_type could be marked non-trustworthy through setting it at least to SKB_GSO_DODGY without any other specific assumptions, but that also feels wrong given we should not go further into the GSO engine in the first place. The checks were added in 121d57af308d ("gso: valid
CVE-2025-68725
bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack
CVE-2025-68725
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: b ...
GHSA-696c-x544-xmc9
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack Yinhao et al. reported that their fuzzer tool was able to trigger a skb_warn_bad_offload() from netif_skb_features() -> gso_features_check(). When a BPF program - triggered via BPF test infra - pushes the packet to the loopback device via bpf_clone_redirect() then mentioned offload warning can be seen. GSO-related features are then rightfully disabled. We get into this situation due to convert___skb_to_skb() setting gso_segs and gso_size but not gso_type. Technically, it makes sense that this warning triggers since the GSO properties are malformed due to the gso_type. Potentially, the gso_type could be marked non-trustworthy through setting it at least to SKB_GSO_DODGY without any other specific assumptions, but that also feels wrong given we should not go further into the GSO engine in the first place. The checks were added in 121d57af308d ("gso: va...
BDU:2026-11431
Уязвимость компонента bpf ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
ROS-20260925-80-0134
Уязвимость kernel-lt
ROS-20260925-73-0179
Уязвимость kernel-lt
ELSA-2026-50232
ELSA-2026-50232: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
ALT-PU-2026-3821
ALT-PU-2026-3821: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 5.10.250-alt1.rt145
ALT-PU-2026-2587
ALT-PU-2026-2587: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 5.10.250-alt1
ELSA-2026-50145
ELSA-2026-50145: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
ELSA-2026-50160
ELSA-2026-50160: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
SUSE-SU-2026:0587-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2026:0447-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2026:0472-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ALT-PU-2026-3750
ALT-PU-2026-3750: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.163-alt1
openSUSE-SU-2026:20287-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ALT-PU-2026-3601
ALT-PU-2026-3601: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.68-alt1
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2025-68725 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack Yinhao et al. reported that their fuzzer tool was able to trigger a skb_warn_bad_offload() from netif_skb_features() -> gso_features_check(). When a BPF program - triggered via BPF test infra - pushes the packet to the loopback device via bpf_clone_redirect() then mentioned offload warning can be seen. GSO-related features are then rightfully disabled. We get into this situation due to convert___skb_to_skb() setting gso_segs and gso_size but not gso_type. Technically, it makes sense that this warning triggers since the GSO properties are malformed due to the gso_type. Potentially, the gso_type could be marked non-trustworthy through setting it at least to SKB_GSO_DODGY without any other specific assumptions, but that also feels wrong given we should not go further into the GSO engine in the first place. The checks were added in 121d57af308d ("gso: valida... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 11 месяцев назад | |
CVE-2025-68725 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack Yinhao et al. reported that their fuzzer tool was able to trigger a skb_warn_bad_offload() from netif_skb_features() -> gso_features_check(). When a BPF program - triggered via BPF test infra - pushes the packet to the loopback device via bpf_clone_redirect() then mentioned offload warning can be seen. GSO-related features are then rightfully disabled. We get into this situation due to convert___skb_to_skb() setting gso_segs and gso_size but not gso_type. Technically, it makes sense that this warning triggers since the GSO properties are malformed due to the gso_type. Potentially, the gso_type could be marked non-trustworthy through setting it at least to SKB_GSO_DODGY without any other specific assumptions, but that also feels wrong given we should not go further into the GSO engine in the first place. The checks were added in 121d57af308d ("gso: valida... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 11 месяцев назад | |
CVE-2025-68725 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack Yinhao et al. reported that their fuzzer tool was able to trigger a skb_warn_bad_offload() from netif_skb_features() -> gso_features_check(). When a BPF program - triggered via BPF test infra - pushes the packet to the loopback device via bpf_clone_redirect() then mentioned offload warning can be seen. GSO-related features are then rightfully disabled. We get into this situation due to convert___skb_to_skb() setting gso_segs and gso_size but not gso_type. Technically, it makes sense that this warning triggers since the GSO properties are malformed due to the gso_type. Potentially, the gso_type could be marked non-trustworthy through setting it at least to SKB_GSO_DODGY without any other specific assumptions, but that also feels wrong given we should not go further into the GSO engine in the first place. The checks were added in 121d57af308d ("gso: valid | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 11 месяцев назад | |
CVE-2025-68725 bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 11 месяцев назад | |
CVE-2025-68725 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: b ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 11 месяцев назад | |
GHSA-696c-x544-xmc9 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack Yinhao et al. reported that their fuzzer tool was able to trigger a skb_warn_bad_offload() from netif_skb_features() -> gso_features_check(). When a BPF program - triggered via BPF test infra - pushes the packet to the loopback device via bpf_clone_redirect() then mentioned offload warning can be seen. GSO-related features are then rightfully disabled. We get into this situation due to convert___skb_to_skb() setting gso_segs and gso_size but not gso_type. Technically, it makes sense that this warning triggers since the GSO properties are malformed due to the gso_type. Potentially, the gso_type could be marked non-trustworthy through setting it at least to SKB_GSO_DODGY without any other specific assumptions, but that also feels wrong given we should not go further into the GSO engine in the first place. The checks were added in 121d57af308d ("gso: va... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 11 месяцев назад | |
BDU:2026-11431 Уязвимость компонента bpf ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
ROS-20260925-80-0134 Уязвимость kernel-lt | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 месяца назад | |
ROS-20260925-73-0179 Уязвимость kernel-lt | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 месяца назад | |
ELSA-2026-50232 ELSA-2026-50232: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | 7 месяцев назад | |||
ALT-PU-2026-3821 ALT-PU-2026-3821: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 5.10.250-alt1.rt145 | CVSS3: 9.8 | 9 месяцев назад | ||
ALT-PU-2026-2587 ALT-PU-2026-2587: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 5.10.250-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | 8 месяцев назад | ||
ELSA-2026-50145 ELSA-2026-50145: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | 8 месяцев назад | |||
ELSA-2026-50160 ELSA-2026-50160: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | 8 месяцев назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2026:0587-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 9 месяцев назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2026:0447-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 9 месяцев назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2026:0472-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 9 месяцев назад | |||
ALT-PU-2026-3750 ALT-PU-2026-3750: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.163-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | 8 месяцев назад | ||
openSUSE-SU-2026:20287-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 8 месяцев назад | |||
ALT-PU-2026-3601 ALT-PU-2026-3601: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.68-alt1 | CVSS3: 8.8 | 9 месяцев назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу