Количество 28
Количество 28
CVE-2025-69420
Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing a malformed TimeStamp Response file. Impact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a malformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() access the signing cert attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed TimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The TimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the exploit is just a Denial...
CVE-2025-69420
Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing a malformed TimeStamp Response file. Impact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a malformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() access the signing cert attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed TimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The TimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the exploit is just a Denial...
CVE-2025-69420
Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing a malformed TimeStamp Response file. Impact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a malformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() access the signing cert attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed TimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The TimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the exploit is just a Denial
CVE-2025-69420
Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp ...
GHSA-w42r-ph9f-9x66
Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing a malformed TimeStamp Response file. Impact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a malformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() access the signing cert attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed TimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The TimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the exploit is just a Den...
ROS-20260420-73-0007
Уязвимость openssl3
ROS-20260420-73-0006
Уязвимость openssl
BDU:2026-01219
Уязвимость функции TS_RESP_verify_response() библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
SUSE-SU-2026:0498-1
Security update for openssl1
SUSE-SU-2026:0333-1
Security update for openssl-1_0_0
SUSE-SU-2026:0332-1
Security update for openssl-1_0_0
SUSE-SU-2026:0360-1
Security update for openssl-1_1
SUSE-SU-2026:0359-1
Security update for openssl-1_1
SUSE-SU-2026:0358-1
Security update for openssl-1_1
SUSE-SU-2026:0346-1
Security update for openssl-1_1
SUSE-SU-2026:0331-1
Security update for openssl-1_1
SUSE-SU-2026:0312-1
Security update for openssl-3
SUSE-SU-2026:0311-1
Security update for openssl-3
SUSE-SU-2026:0310-1
Security update for openssl-3
SUSE-SU-2026:0309-1
Security update for openssl-3
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | CVE-2025-69420 Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing a malformed TimeStamp Response file. Impact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a malformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() access the signing cert attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed TimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The TimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the exploit is just a Denial... | CVSS3: 7.5 | 1% Низкий | 6 месяцев назад |
 | CVE-2025-69420 Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing a malformed TimeStamp Response file. Impact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a malformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() access the signing cert attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed TimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The TimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the exploit is just a Denial... | CVSS3: 5.9 | 1% Низкий | 6 месяцев назад |
 | CVE-2025-69420 Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing a malformed TimeStamp Response file. Impact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a malformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() access the signing cert attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed TimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The TimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the exploit is just a Denial | CVSS3: 7.5 | 1% Низкий | 6 месяцев назад |
| CVE-2025-69420 Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp ... | CVSS3: 7.5 | 1% Низкий | 6 месяцев назад |
| GHSA-w42r-ph9f-9x66 Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing a malformed TimeStamp Response file. Impact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a malformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() access the signing cert attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed TimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The TimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the exploit is just a Den... | CVSS3: 7.5 | 1% Низкий | 6 месяцев назад |
 | ROS-20260420-73-0007 Уязвимость openssl3 | CVSS3: 7.5 | 1% Низкий | 3 месяца назад |
| ROS-20260420-73-0006 Уязвимость openssl | CVSS3: 7.5 | 1% Низкий | 3 месяца назад |
 | BDU:2026-01219 Уязвимость функции TS_RESP_verify_response() библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании | CVSS3: 7.5 | 1% Низкий | 8 месяцев назад |
 | SUSE-SU-2026:0498-1 Security update for openssl1 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2026:0333-1 Security update for openssl-1_0_0 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2026:0332-1 Security update for openssl-1_0_0 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2026:0360-1 Security update for openssl-1_1 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2026:0359-1 Security update for openssl-1_1 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2026:0358-1 Security update for openssl-1_1 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2026:0346-1 Security update for openssl-1_1 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2026:0331-1 Security update for openssl-1_1 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2026:0312-1 Security update for openssl-3 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2026:0311-1 Security update for openssl-3 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2026:0310-1 Security update for openssl-3 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
| SUSE-SU-2026:0309-1 Security update for openssl-3 | 6 месяцев назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу