Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in Gleam allows an adversary in the middle to substitute forged Hex package contents during dependency resolution. During dependency resolution Gleam fetches package metadata from the signature-verified Hex repository, which covers each release's dependency requirements and SHA-256 outer_checksum. After resolving versions, gleam_cli::dependencies::lookup_package makes a second request to the unsigned Hex API through gleam_core::hex::get_package_release and records the outer_checksum and dependency names from that JSON response into manifest.toml, instead of the values from the verified repository metadata. The Hex repository signature does not cover the API response. An adversary in the middle who can intercept TLS with a certificate trusted by the Gleam process (for example a TLS-inspecting proxy using a CA in the operating system trust store or added through GLEAM_CACERTS_PATH), and who can modify both the API release res

Allocation of resources without limits vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a remote HTTP/2 server to exhaust memory on the client host and cause a denial of service. The Mint.HTTP2.handle_continuation/3 function in lib/mint/http2.ex accumulates the header-block fragment carried by each HTTP/2 CONTINUATION frame into a growing conn.headers_being_processed nesting, one level deeper per frame, and only releases it when a frame with the END_HEADERS flag arrives. The only guard on this accumulator is Mint.HTTP2.assert_header_block_within_max_size/2, which sums the byte size of the fragments received so far. Because a CONTINUATION frame is permitted by the protocol to carry a zero-length payload, an unbounded chain of zero-length CONTINUATION frames adds no bytes to the running total, never trips the size cap, and never emits END_HEADERS, yet each frame still nests the accumulator one level deeper. A malicious HTTP/2 server (reachable directly, via an attacker-controlled redirect, via

In the Apache Airflow FAB auth manager, a DAG whose `dag_id` is `DAGs` collided with the global all-DAGs permission resource name produced by `resource_name()`, so a user granted per-DAG `access_control` on that one DAG was silently granted the global all-DAGs permission (privilege escalation). The escalation triggers when a DAG named `DAGs` exists and a lower-privileged user is given per-DAG access to it, granting that user read/edit access to every DAG. Users are advised to upgrade to `apache-airflow-providers-fab` 3.7.2 or later, which disambiguates the resource-name collision.

Apache Airflow's secrets masker did not mask `var.json` Variable values whose value is a dict in the Rendered Templates UI — the dict value failed an `isinstance(str)` guard — so a secret stored as a JSON Variable and referenced in a template via `var.json` was displayed in cleartext to any user with access to that task's Rendered Templates view. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which masks nested Variable values regardless of type.

The FAB auth manager's Azure AD OAuth login defaulted `verify_signature=False` when decoding the ID token, so an attacker able to present a forged or unsigned (`alg:none`) ID token to the OAuth callback could bypass authentication and log in as an arbitrary user, including one holding the Admin role (CWE-347). Deployments running the FAB auth manager with the Azure AD OAuth login path under its default configuration are affected; the Authentik path already defaulted to `True`. This issue affects `apache-airflow-providers-fab` before 3.7.3. Users are advised to upgrade to `apache-airflow-providers-fab` 3.7.3, which defaults `verify_signature=True`.

Apache Airflow's XCom `GET /api/v2/{...}/xcomEntries/{key}?deserialize=true` endpoint passed a string-literal payload through `BaseXCom.deserialize_value` without the `_check_forbidden_xcom_keys` guard, allowing an authenticated API user with XCom write-and-read access to instantiate arbitrary `airflow.*` classes on the API server (CWE-502). An authenticated user who can write an XCom value and then read it back with `deserialize=true` triggers the unsafe instantiation. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which rejects reserved XCom serialization keys submitted as JSON string literals.

The vulnerability involves an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the `DeleteNotificationController::delete()` method at endpoint `GET /notification/delete/{id}`. The flaw allows any authenticated user, regardless of company or permissions, to delete notifications belonging to any other user in the system. The controller retrieves the target record with `Notification::findOrFail($id)` and deletes it without validating `user_id` or `company_id` ownership, unlike the sibling `SetNotificationReadAjaxController`, which correctly scopes lookups by `Auth::id()`. Because notification identifiers are sequential, an attacker can iterate over IDs to systematically delete notifications belonging to any user, denying them visibility of ticket alerts, task assignments, and other system events.

Malicious use of a stolen cookie might allow modifications to the contents of the IP phone’s webpage.

Stored Cross-site Scripting (CWE-79) in the email module in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.4.4 allows a remote, authenticated low-privileged user to execute arbitrary JavaScript in another user's browser, including administrators, leading to session compromise and account takeover, via a payload stored in an email body that is persisted without sanitization and rendered unescaped with {!! $email->body !!} when the recipient opens the message.

Stored Cross-site Scripting (CWE-79) in the client-side report rendering functions (renderPreview, renderEditor, renderAuditData in js/app.js) in maalfer Pentestify before 1.1.0 allows a remote, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browser of any user who views an affected report via a payload stored in a finding's images array or a report's client_logo array, which is interpolated into an <img> src attribute without escaping.

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in the Order and OrderItem REST API controllers in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.5.3 allows a remote, authenticated user to read, modify, and delete orders and order items belonging to any other company (tenant) via a sequential numeric {id} supplied to GET /api/order/{id}, PUT /api/order/{id}, GET /api/order-item/{id}, PUT /api/order-item/{id}, or DELETE /api/order-item/{id}, because the controllers resolve records with Order::find($id) / Item::find($id) without scoping by the authenticated user's company.

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in the Excel import handlers (CustomerImport, LeadImport, ProductImport) in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.14.0 allows a remote, authenticated user of any role or company to create customer, lead, and product records inside another company's tenant via a spreadsheet whose company_id column points to the victim tenant, uploaded to POST /customer/import/excel/save, which maps company_id directly from the file and performs no check that it matches the authenticated user's company.

Missing Authorization (CWE-862) in BankAccountListController (app/Http/Controllers/Api/BankAccount/BankAccountListController.php), exposed at GET /api/bank-account, in Prospero Flow CRM <5.5.3, which allows a remote, authenticated attacker holding a low-privileged role (e.g. the "User"/"Usuario" role) to read arbitrary bank account records belonging to their company by sending an authenticated request to the endpoint with a valid bearer token, because the API route is protected only by the auth:api middleware and carries no permission gate, unlike the equivalent web route, which enforces can('read bank'), and the handler resolves records with Account::where('company_id', Auth::user()->company_id)->get(), performing only company scoping and no role or permission check before returning the data. This results in the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive banking information (e.g. IBAN, SWIFT/BIC, account identifiers) to users who should not have access to it.

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in CalendarDeleteEventController (app/Http/Controllers/Calendar/CalendarDeleteEventController.php), exposed at GET /calendar/event/delete/{id}, in Prospero Flow CRM before 5.5.3 allows a remote, authenticated attacker to delete arbitrary calendar events belonging to other users by manipulating the {id} path parameter, because the delete handler resolves the record with Calendar::find($id)->delete() and performs no ownership check (no user_id/company_id scoping) before deletion. This results in unauthorized destruction of other users' calendar events across the platform.

Missing Authorization in the permission management component in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.2.1 allows any authenticated user to grant any role, including their own, the complete set of application permissions via a crafted POST request to the permission save endpoint, which performs no authorization check before synchronizing the submitted permissions to the specified role.

Cross-site Scripting in the lead index view in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.3.7 allows authenticated users holding the create or update lead permission to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the application origin via HTML markup stored in the lead name field, which the view renders through Blade's unescaped output directive and inside a JavaScript string literal in an onclick attribute.

Server-Side Request Forgery in the PDF export component in maalfer Pentestify before 1.1.0 allows authenticated users to cause outbound HTTP GET requests from the server to arbitrary attacker-chosen destinations via unvalidated URLs stored in the finding images field or the report client_logo field, which the server-side headless browser fetches while rendering the report.

Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 2.17.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0. The camel-mail component ships a MimeMultipart data format that can unmarshal a MIME multipart message. When it is configured with headersInline set to true, the unmarshal path copies the MIME headers of the incoming message onto the Camel message: it enumerates every header that is not one of the three standard ones it generates itself - Message-ID, MIME-Version and Content-Type - and calls setHeader for each, applying no HeaderFilterStrategy. The names of those MIME headers come from the message being unmarshalled, so a sender able to influence the message could place a header whose name falls in the Camel-internal namespace and have it set on the Exchange. Camel components read control headers from that namespace to override their configured behaviour - the camel-sql producer, for instance, takes the statemen

The IP phone might use malicious input stored in configuration parameters and render it as content for the WebUI’s webpage.

Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.8.11 before 0.10.0, POST /api/v1/images/edit required only a verified account and did not enforce the global image-edit switch or the per-user image-generation permission, allowing a non-admin user to invoke server-side image editing with administrator-configured provider credentials. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.