Количество 45
Количество 45

SUSE-SU-2021:4112-1
Security update for log4j12

SUSE-SU-2021:4111-1
Security update for log4j

SUSE-SU-2021:14866-1
Security update for log4j
GHSA-fp5r-v3w9-4333
JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data
ELSA-2022-9056
ELSA-2022-9056: log4j security update (IMPORTANT)
ELSA-2021-5206
ELSA-2021-5206: log4j security update (MODERATE)

BDU:2022-00031
Уязвимость реализации класса JMSAppender библиотеки журналирования Java-программ Log4j, позволяющая нарушителю выполнить произвольный код

CVE-2022-23302
JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.

CVE-2022-23302
JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.

CVE-2022-23302
JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.
CVE-2022-23302
JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization ...
GHSA-w9p3-5cr8-m3jj
Deserialization of Untrusted Data in Log4j 1.x

BDU:2022-00526
Уязвимость реализации класса JMSSink библиотеки журналирования Java-программ Log4j, позволяющая нарушителю выполнить произвольный код

CVE-2022-23307
CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists.

CVE-2022-23307
CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists.

CVE-2022-23307
CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists.
CVE-2022-23307
CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in A ...

CVE-2022-23305
By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.

CVE-2022-23305
By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.

CVE-2022-23305
By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | SUSE-SU-2021:4112-1 Security update for log4j12 | 73% Высокий | больше 3 лет назад | |
![]() | SUSE-SU-2021:4111-1 Security update for log4j | 73% Высокий | больше 3 лет назад | |
![]() | SUSE-SU-2021:14866-1 Security update for log4j | 73% Высокий | больше 3 лет назад | |
GHSA-fp5r-v3w9-4333 JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data | CVSS3: 7.5 | 73% Высокий | больше 3 лет назад | |
ELSA-2022-9056 ELSA-2022-9056: log4j security update (IMPORTANT) | больше 3 лет назад | |||
ELSA-2021-5206 ELSA-2021-5206: log4j security update (MODERATE) | больше 3 лет назад | |||
![]() | BDU:2022-00031 Уязвимость реализации класса JMSAppender библиотеки журналирования Java-программ Log4j, позволяющая нарушителю выполнить произвольный код | CVSS3: 6.6 | 73% Высокий | больше 3 лет назад |
![]() | CVE-2022-23302 JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | CVSS3: 8.8 | 0% Низкий | больше 3 лет назад |
![]() | CVE-2022-23302 JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | CVSS3: 8.8 | 0% Низкий | больше 3 лет назад |
![]() | CVE-2022-23302 JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | CVSS3: 8.8 | 0% Низкий | больше 3 лет назад |
CVE-2022-23302 JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization ... | CVSS3: 8.8 | 0% Низкий | больше 3 лет назад | |
GHSA-w9p3-5cr8-m3jj Deserialization of Untrusted Data in Log4j 1.x | CVSS3: 8.8 | 0% Низкий | больше 3 лет назад | |
![]() | BDU:2022-00526 Уязвимость реализации класса JMSSink библиотеки журналирования Java-программ Log4j, позволяющая нарушителю выполнить произвольный код | CVSS3: 6.6 | 0% Низкий | больше 3 лет назад |
![]() | CVE-2022-23307 CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists. | CVSS3: 8.8 | 1% Низкий | больше 3 лет назад |
![]() | CVE-2022-23307 CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists. | CVSS3: 8.8 | 1% Низкий | больше 3 лет назад |
![]() | CVE-2022-23307 CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists. | CVSS3: 8.8 | 1% Низкий | больше 3 лет назад |
CVE-2022-23307 CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in A ... | CVSS3: 8.8 | 1% Низкий | больше 3 лет назад | |
![]() | CVE-2022-23305 By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | CVSS3: 9.8 | 15% Средний | больше 3 лет назад |
![]() | CVE-2022-23305 By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | CVSS3: 8.8 | 15% Средний | больше 3 лет назад |
![]() | CVE-2022-23305 By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | CVSS3: 9.8 | 15% Средний | больше 3 лет назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу