Поиск уязвимостей
Количество 24
Количество 24
BDU:2025-09255
Уязвимость файловой системы Btrfs (fs/btrfs/inode.c) ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
CVE-2025-38365
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix a race between renames and directory logging We have a race between a rename and directory inode logging that if it happens and we crash/power fail before the rename completes, the next time the filesystem is mounted, the log replay code will end up deleting the file that was being renamed. This is best explained following a step by step analysis of an interleaving of steps that lead into this situation. Consider the initial conditions: 1) We are at transaction N; 2) We have directories A and B created in a past transaction (< N); 3) We have inode X corresponding to a file that has 2 hardlinks, one in directory A and the other in directory B, so we'll name them as "A/foo_link1" and "B/foo_link2". Both hard links were persisted in a past transaction (< N); 4) We have inode Y corresponding to a file that as a single hard link and is located in directory A, we'll name it as "A/bar". This file was also persis...
CVE-2025-38365
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix a race between renames and directory logging We have a race between a rename and directory inode logging that if it happens and we crash/power fail before the rename completes, the next time the filesystem is mounted, the log replay code will end up deleting the file that was being renamed. This is best explained following a step by step analysis of an interleaving of steps that lead into this situation. Consider the initial conditions: 1) We are at transaction N; 2) We have directories A and B created in a past transaction (< N); 3) We have inode X corresponding to a file that has 2 hardlinks, one in directory A and the other in directory B, so we'll name them as "A/foo_link1" and "B/foo_link2". Both hard links were persisted in a past transaction (< N); 4) We have inode Y corresponding to a file that as a single hard link and is located in directory A, we'll name it as "A/bar". This file was also persis...
CVE-2025-38365
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix a race between renames and directory logging We have a race between a rename and directory inode logging that if it happens and we crash/power fail before the rename completes, the next time the filesystem is mounted, the log replay code will end up deleting the file that was being renamed. This is best explained following a step by step analysis of an interleaving of steps that lead into this situation. Consider the initial conditions: 1) We are at transaction N; 2) We have directories A and B created in a past transaction (< N); 3) We have inode X corresponding to a file that has 2 hardlinks, one in directory A and the other in directory B, so we'll name them as "A/foo_link1" and "B/foo_link2". Both hard links were persisted in a past transaction (< N); 4) We have inode Y corresponding to a file that as a single hard link and is located in directory A, we'll name it as "A/bar". This fil
CVE-2025-38365
btrfs: fix a race between renames and directory logging
CVE-2025-38365
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: b ...
ROS-20250902-01
Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt
GHSA-4w5g-r898-rj85
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix a race between renames and directory logging We have a race between a rename and directory inode logging that if it happens and we crash/power fail before the rename completes, the next time the filesystem is mounted, the log replay code will end up deleting the file that was being renamed. This is best explained following a step by step analysis of an interleaving of steps that lead into this situation. Consider the initial conditions: 1) We are at transaction N; 2) We have directories A and B created in a past transaction (< N); 3) We have inode X corresponding to a file that has 2 hardlinks, one in directory A and the other in directory B, so we'll name them as "A/foo_link1" and "B/foo_link2". Both hard links were persisted in a past transaction (< N); 4) We have inode Y corresponding to a file that as a single hard link and is located in directory A, we'll name it as "A/bar". This ...
ALT-PU-2025-16596
ALT-PU-2025-16596: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.144-alt1
ALT-PU-2025-16509
ALT-PU-2025-16509: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.41-alt1
ALT-PU-2025-16464
ALT-PU-2025-16464: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.12.41-alt1
ALT-PU-2026-1529
ALT-PU-2026-1529: package `kernel-image-pine` update to version 6.12.66-alt1
ALT-PU-2025-12647
ALT-PU-2025-12647: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.49-alt1
SUSE-SU-2025:03023-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:02996-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:02969-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:02853-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:02997-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:03011-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ELSA-2025-20551
ELSA-2025-20551: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDU:2025-09255 Уязвимость файловой системы Btrfs (fs/btrfs/inode.c) ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
CVE-2025-38365 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix a race between renames and directory logging We have a race between a rename and directory inode logging that if it happens and we crash/power fail before the rename completes, the next time the filesystem is mounted, the log replay code will end up deleting the file that was being renamed. This is best explained following a step by step analysis of an interleaving of steps that lead into this situation. Consider the initial conditions: 1) We are at transaction N; 2) We have directories A and B created in a past transaction (< N); 3) We have inode X corresponding to a file that has 2 hardlinks, one in directory A and the other in directory B, so we'll name them as "A/foo_link1" and "B/foo_link2". Both hard links were persisted in a past transaction (< N); 4) We have inode Y corresponding to a file that as a single hard link and is located in directory A, we'll name it as "A/bar". This file was also persis... | CVSS3: 4.7 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
CVE-2025-38365 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix a race between renames and directory logging We have a race between a rename and directory inode logging that if it happens and we crash/power fail before the rename completes, the next time the filesystem is mounted, the log replay code will end up deleting the file that was being renamed. This is best explained following a step by step analysis of an interleaving of steps that lead into this situation. Consider the initial conditions: 1) We are at transaction N; 2) We have directories A and B created in a past transaction (< N); 3) We have inode X corresponding to a file that has 2 hardlinks, one in directory A and the other in directory B, so we'll name them as "A/foo_link1" and "B/foo_link2". Both hard links were persisted in a past transaction (< N); 4) We have inode Y corresponding to a file that as a single hard link and is located in directory A, we'll name it as "A/bar". This file was also persis... | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | ||
CVE-2025-38365 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix a race between renames and directory logging We have a race between a rename and directory inode logging that if it happens and we crash/power fail before the rename completes, the next time the filesystem is mounted, the log replay code will end up deleting the file that was being renamed. This is best explained following a step by step analysis of an interleaving of steps that lead into this situation. Consider the initial conditions: 1) We are at transaction N; 2) We have directories A and B created in a past transaction (< N); 3) We have inode X corresponding to a file that has 2 hardlinks, one in directory A and the other in directory B, so we'll name them as "A/foo_link1" and "B/foo_link2". Both hard links were persisted in a past transaction (< N); 4) We have inode Y corresponding to a file that as a single hard link and is located in directory A, we'll name it as "A/bar". This fil | CVSS3: 4.7 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
CVE-2025-38365 btrfs: fix a race between renames and directory logging | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
CVE-2025-38365 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: b ... | CVSS3: 4.7 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
ROS-20250902-01 Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt | CVSS3: 5.5 | около 1 года назад | ||
GHSA-4w5g-r898-rj85 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix a race between renames and directory logging We have a race between a rename and directory inode logging that if it happens and we crash/power fail before the rename completes, the next time the filesystem is mounted, the log replay code will end up deleting the file that was being renamed. This is best explained following a step by step analysis of an interleaving of steps that lead into this situation. Consider the initial conditions: 1) We are at transaction N; 2) We have directories A and B created in a past transaction (< N); 3) We have inode X corresponding to a file that has 2 hardlinks, one in directory A and the other in directory B, so we'll name them as "A/foo_link1" and "B/foo_link2". Both hard links were persisted in a past transaction (< N); 4) We have inode Y corresponding to a file that as a single hard link and is located in directory A, we'll name it as "A/bar". This ... | CVSS3: 4.7 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
ALT-PU-2025-16596 ALT-PU-2025-16596: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.144-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.3 | больше 1 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2025-16509 ALT-PU-2025-16509: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.41-alt1 | CVSS3: 8.8 | больше 1 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2025-16464 ALT-PU-2025-16464: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.12.41-alt1 | CVSS3: 8.8 | больше 1 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2026-1529 ALT-PU-2026-1529: package `kernel-image-pine` update to version 6.12.66-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | 10 месяцев назад | ||
ALT-PU-2025-12647 ALT-PU-2025-12647: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.49-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | около 1 года назад | ||
SUSE-SU-2025:03023-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:02996-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:02969-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:02853-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:02997-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:03011-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад | |||
ELSA-2025-20551 ELSA-2025-20551: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | около 1 года назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу