Поиск уязвимостей
Количество 106
Количество 106
ALT-PU-2025-2804
ALT-PU-2025-2804: package `python3-module-asyncssh` update to version 2.19.0-alt1
ROS-20241216-07
Множественные уязвимости python3-asyncssh
CVE-2023-46445
An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the extension info message (RFC 8308) via a man-in-the-middle attack, aka a "Rogue Extension Negotiation."
CVE-2023-46445
An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the extension info message (RFC 8308) via a man-in-the-middle attack, aka a "Rogue Extension Negotiation."
CVE-2023-46445
An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the extension info message (RFC 8308) via a man-in-the-middle attack, aka a "Rogue Extension Negotiation."
CVE-2023-46445
An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the ext ...
GHSA-cfc2-wr2v-gxm5
AsyncSSH Rogue Extension Negotiation
BDU:2024-11318
Уязвимость пакета клиентской и серверной реализации протокола SSHv2 asyncssh интерпретатора языка программирования Python, позволяющая нарушителю проводить атаки типа "человек по середине"
CVE-2023-46446
An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the remote end of an SSH client session via packet injection/removal and shell emulation, aka a "Rogue Session Attack."
CVE-2023-46446
An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the remote end of an SSH client session via packet injection/removal and shell emulation, aka a "Rogue Session Attack."
CVE-2023-46446
An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the remote end of an SSH client session via packet injection/removal and shell emulation, aka a "Rogue Session Attack."
CVE-2023-46446
An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the rem ...
GHSA-c35q-ffpf-5qpm
AsyncSSH Rogue Session Attack
BDU:2024-11319
Уязвимость пакета клиентской и серверной реализации протокола SSHv2 asyncssh интерпретатора языка программирования Python, позволяющая нарушителю проводить атаки типа "человек по середине"
CVE-2023-48795
The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before...
CVE-2023-48795
The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before...
CVE-2023-48795
The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.
CVE-2023-48795
CVE-2023-48795
The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in O ...
openSUSE-SU-2024:0135-1
Security update for gitui
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ALT-PU-2025-2804 ALT-PU-2025-2804: package `python3-module-asyncssh` update to version 2.19.0-alt1 | CVSS3: 7.4 | больше 1 года назад | ||
ROS-20241216-07 Множественные уязвимости python3-asyncssh | CVSS3: 6.8 | почти 2 года назад | ||
CVE-2023-46445 An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the extension info message (RFC 8308) via a man-in-the-middle attack, aka a "Rogue Extension Negotiation." | CVSS3: 5.9 | 1% Низкий | почти 3 года назад | |
CVE-2023-46445 An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the extension info message (RFC 8308) via a man-in-the-middle attack, aka a "Rogue Extension Negotiation." | CVSS3: 5.9 | 1% Низкий | почти 3 года назад | |
CVE-2023-46445 An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the extension info message (RFC 8308) via a man-in-the-middle attack, aka a "Rogue Extension Negotiation." | CVSS3: 5.9 | 1% Низкий | почти 3 года назад | |
CVE-2023-46445 An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the ext ... | CVSS3: 5.9 | 1% Низкий | почти 3 года назад | |
GHSA-cfc2-wr2v-gxm5 AsyncSSH Rogue Extension Negotiation | CVSS3: 5.3 | 1% Низкий | около 3 лет назад | |
BDU:2024-11318 Уязвимость пакета клиентской и серверной реализации протокола SSHv2 asyncssh интерпретатора языка программирования Python, позволяющая нарушителю проводить атаки типа "человек по середине" | CVSS3: 5.9 | 1% Низкий | почти 3 года назад | |
CVE-2023-46446 An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the remote end of an SSH client session via packet injection/removal and shell emulation, aka a "Rogue Session Attack." | CVSS3: 6.8 | 1% Низкий | почти 3 года назад | |
CVE-2023-46446 An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the remote end of an SSH client session via packet injection/removal and shell emulation, aka a "Rogue Session Attack." | CVSS3: 6.8 | 1% Низкий | почти 3 года назад | |
CVE-2023-46446 An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the remote end of an SSH client session via packet injection/removal and shell emulation, aka a "Rogue Session Attack." | CVSS3: 6.8 | 1% Низкий | почти 3 года назад | |
CVE-2023-46446 An issue in AsyncSSH before 2.14.1 allows attackers to control the rem ... | CVSS3: 6.8 | 1% Низкий | почти 3 года назад | |
GHSA-c35q-ffpf-5qpm AsyncSSH Rogue Session Attack | CVSS3: 8.1 | 1% Низкий | около 3 лет назад | |
BDU:2024-11319 Уязвимость пакета клиентской и серверной реализации протокола SSHv2 asyncssh интерпретатора языка программирования Python, позволяющая нарушителю проводить атаки типа "человек по середине" | CVSS3: 6.8 | 1% Низкий | почти 3 года назад | |
CVE-2023-48795 The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before... | CVSS3: 5.9 | 94% Критический | почти 3 года назад | |
CVE-2023-48795 The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before... | CVSS3: 5.9 | 94% Критический | почти 3 года назад | |
CVE-2023-48795 The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0. | CVSS3: 5.9 | 94% Критический | почти 3 года назад | |
CVSS3: 5.9 | 94% Критический | около 2 лет назад | ||
CVE-2023-48795 The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in O ... | CVSS3: 5.9 | 94% Критический | почти 3 года назад | |
openSUSE-SU-2024:0135-1 Security update for gitui | 94% Критический | больше 2 лет назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу